Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell

[Zocalo]

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children.

Good lord are you so obtuse?

I actually think Marquez would win, but he wouldn't win easily.

You post something for people to discuss and now you are running away from it? It sure sounds like you are the dimwitted child.

[OnePunch]

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children.

And you cant argue your point that JMM beats Nate. Based on what? On being on the floor 4 times against Pac? On stopping an old Casa in 11 that Nate would have put away in 5 or 6? A green Nate fought a prime casa 5 years ago, in a fight alot of folks thought Nate won. And JMM fights the washed up version of casa, and 2 judges have it even after 10 rounds. You may have an OPINION that JMM beats Nate, but that doesnt make it FACT. I'm pretty sure if I gave a **** enough to look, you probably had a post awhile back that said "Diaz will easily beat Nate". So what? lol. How about they just fight, and then we'll see who wins?

[KJB]

I dont think thats giving Campbell enough respect. I know the guy has had some tough spots in his career, but he really redeemed a lot of that against Juan Diaz. After that fight I think we can all agree that when Nate has his head together, and actually shows up to fight, hes a very bad man.
JMM is also a legit BMF, but you have to keep in mind he is the physically smaller of the two, and is probably just as high if not higher mileage than Campbell. Id keep my money in my pocket on this one.

[joseph5620]

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children.

What you posted are subjective and biased opinions. Marquez beating Campbell is not a fact. So don't act like you schooled anybody here. Until Marquez actually does it, you don't have **** in terms of facts. I'm sure you also picked Diaz over Campbell "easily". How did that pick turn out?

[joseph5620]

And you cant argue your point that JMM beats Nate. Based on what? On being on the floor 4 times against Pac? On stopping an old Casa in 11 that Nate would have put away in 5 or 6? A green Nate fought a prime casa 5 years ago, in a fight alot of folks thought Nate won. And JMM fights the washed up version of casa, and 2 judges have it even after 10 rounds. You may have an OPINION that JMM beats Nate, but that doesnt make it FACT. I'm pretty sure if I gave a **** enough to look, you probably had a post awhile back that said "Diaz will easily beat Nate". So what? lol. How about they just fight, and then we'll see who wins?

My thoughts exactly.

[OnePunch]

you have to keep in mind he is the physically smaller of the two, and is probably just as high if not higher mileage than Campbell. Id keep my money in my pocket on this one.

Actually, JMM has quite a few more miles on him than Nate....

Year turned pro - JMM 1993 - Nate 2000
Fights - JMM 53 - Nate 38
Rounds fought - JMM 390 - Nate 220
Age - JMM 35 - Nate 36

[El Chicano]

Campbell will always be remembered for one thing, and it's this:



Loser

[OnePunch]

Campbell will always be remembered for one thing, and it's this:



Loser

And Guzman will always be remembered for one thing too. lol

idiot.

[El Chicano]

Watch again, it's pretty damn funny



He's a ****y mother ****er and that's what he gets.

[Papa Ace]

Easily dispose? LOL. Fight with Casa is almost even until the KO.