Terrible post Haye was the cruiserweight champion, He beat Mormeck who was a good fighter at the time then he beat Enzo who just held a paper belt for local honours. Mormeck was the true cruiserweight champion at the time he held WBC, WBA and Ring titles the only reason he didnt have the IBF was because the IBF stripped Bell who chose to fight Mormeck. I have seen in some of your post that you have called Adamek the undisputed cruiserweight champion, I like Adamek but how can you call him an undisputed champion at cruiserweight when he only holds the IBF title and the ring title all won off a guy who won it due to Bell being stripped I don’t understand that logic maybe you can enlighten me?
Also Adamek had only just moved up in weight and was not considered a main contender at the time Cunningham was just a paper belt holder Huck had just lost to Cunningham and wouldn’t have been worth a fight at the time and Jones was coming off a 2 year lay off after beating Braithwaite. I could just as legitimately say that Wlad or Vitali are not the best heavyweight because they never faced the top men of the division like Holyfield or Tyson.
I don’t care if you think Haye is crap that don’t bother me but to say he wasn’t a good cruiserweight is just a load of rubbish.
Also Adamek had only just moved up in weight and was not considered a main contender at the time Cunningham was just a paper belt holder Huck had just lost to Cunningham and wouldn’t have been worth a fight at the time and Jones was coming off a 2 year lay off after beating Braithwaite. I could just as legitimately say that Wlad or Vitali are not the best heavyweight because they never faced the top men of the division like Holyfield or Tyson.
I don’t care if you think Haye is crap that don’t bother me but to say he wasn’t a good cruiserweight is just a load of rubbish.
Comment