lol at hype job pavlik

[boxasmash]

his one and only defense at middleweight is against gary lockett, a domestic british titlist level fighter.

he has a nerve to call out the big boys, his resume is horrid!

O-VER-RATED

[mojack]

His best win is Taylor IMO, and I've always though Taylor was overrated anyway. Only time will tell.

[Dan...]

To threadstarter - are you an alt?

[TheGreatA]

his one and only defense at middleweight is against gary lockett, a domestic british titlist level fighter.

he has a nerve to call out the big boys, his resume is horrid!

O-VER-RATED

How else would he make his resume greater if he did not call the 'big boys' out?

Pavlik is fighting old Hopkins next, that's a pretty good way to make a point to Joe Calzaghe if he can defeat Hopkins easier than Calzaghe did.

[boxasmash]

To threadstarter - are you an alt?

if an alt means i have another account then no

[boxasmash]

How else would he make his resume greater if he did not call the 'big boys' out?

Pavlik is fighting old Hopkins next, that's a pretty good way to make a point to Joe Calzaghe if he can defeat Hopkins easier than Calzaghe did.

nothing wrong with that

if he beats hopkins he can call calz name but as it stands he has no right. he should fight abraham more than calz imo, his resume is not good as it stands but he has plenty of time to improve it.

[WLAD OWNS]

Pavlik's resume is 1,000 times better than Hypejob Haye's

[T-97]

Pavlik's resume is 1,000 times better than Hypejob Haye's

This thread has nothing to do with Haye. Get off his balls.

[Dan...]

Pavlik's resume is 1,000 times better than Hypejob Haye's

What does Haye have to do with anything.


Whilst I think there is still a small question mark over Pavlik it is incorrect to call him a hypejob. He beat an elite guy in Taylor twice, definately not a hype job.

[Kobe Bryant]

He's the undisputed middleweught champ. Nothing overrated about that, it's a fact.