Kessler-Taylor

[ACHlLLES]

Kessler has almost every advantage in this fight, but I doubt this fight will ever be made since Kessler has a ****ty promoter named palle and palle has been a little ***** ever since Kessler lost to Calzaghe. Kessler is naturally bigger then taylor, don't buy into the hype when taylor says that he is too small for a middleweight. If that were the case then he wouldn't have been fighting junior middleweights and going the distance with smaller guys then himself. Also taylor is good but he never did look god like, cory spinks kind of exposed taylor in there fight. Even if Spinks didn't win and it was one of the most broing fights ever in the entire sport, spinks still did something to taylor... He made Taylor look real bad. Also, Kessler is as fast as taylor and definitely I would say stronger then Taylor... Kessler is like a copy of pavlik except Kessler moves in better angles in my opinion. But I think Kessler is also there more to be hit, I don't think his defense is all that great compared to Pavliks. I think Pavlik has a pretty solid defense when he is a come forward type fighter. Thats why people are scared when they fight pavlik, the guy comes forward and not always in angles but his defense and picking your punching apart is amazing. People compare Pavlik to Lacy because of his come-forward kind of style but what those same people didn't realize is that Pavliks defense is far superior to lacys. Oh, and Jeff Lacy vs Jermaine Taylor is a ****ing dumb ass fight, taylor will pick lacys **** defense apart. Lacy is an ass fighter who almost got exposed by Peter Manfredo. The same Peter Manfredo who kept falling on the ropes against Calzaghe like a little *****. I might be knocking on Manfredo, I don't think he is that good of a boxer but I do think he knows this sport and he loves it. I saw interviews with him and he knows how to pick fights good(pick calzaghe over hopkins, picked calzaghe over kessler), the only problem is that I think he keeps fighting at the wrong weight class. I personally don't think super middle weight is his weight class. I think he is too small for the weight class.

[Flawless]

Beating Hopkins twice is enough to shown that you are proven.

[Chrismart]

Kessler UD.

[ACHlLLES]

Beating Hopkins twice is enough to shown that you are proven.

Anyone who saw those fights knows Hopkins got cheated

[T-97]

Beating Hopkins twice is enough to shown that you are proven.

Along with almost losing to 3 Jr Middleweights in a row.

[Dan...]

Kessler has almost every advantage in this fight, but I doubt this fight will ever be made since Kessler has a ****ty promoter named palle and palle has been a little ***** ever since Kessler lost to Calzaghe. Kessler is naturally bigger then taylor, don't buy into the hype when taylor says that he is too small for a middleweight. If that were the case then he wouldn't have been fighting junior middleweights and going the distance with smaller guys then himself. Also taylor is good but he never did look god like, cory spinks kind of exposed taylor in there fight. Even if Spinks didn't win and it was one of the most broing fights ever in the entire sport, spinks still did something to taylor... He made Taylor look real bad. Also, Kessler is as fast as taylor and definitely I would say stronger then Taylor... Kessler is like a copy of pavlik except Kessler moves in better angles in my opinion. But I think Kessler is also there more to be hit, I don't think his defense is all that great compared to Pavliks. I think Pavlik has a pretty solid defense when he is a come forward type fighter. Thats why people are scared when they fight pavlik, the guy comes forward and not always in angles but his defense and picking your punching apart is amazing. People compare Pavlik to Lacy because of his come-forward kind of style but what those same people didn't realize is that Pavliks defense is far superior to lacys. Oh, and Jeff Lacy vs Jermaine Taylor is a ****ing dumb ass fight, taylor will pick lacys **** defense apart. Lacy is an ass fighter who almost got exposed by Peter Manfredo. The same Peter Manfredo who kept falling on the ropes against Calzaghe like a little *****. I might be knocking on Manfredo, I don't think he is that good of a boxer but I do think he knows this sport and he loves it. I saw interviews with him and he knows how to pick fights good(pick calzaghe over hopkins, picked calzaghe over kessler), the only problem is that I think he keeps fighting at the wrong weight class. I personally don't think super middle weight is his weight class. I think he is too small for the weight class.

Paragraphing is a useful tool.

[Clegg]

Beating Hopkins twice is enough to shown that you are proven.

Give us a stylistic analysis.

How will each one look to control the fight?

Will Kessler try and hold centre ring with his jab, or come forward, applying continual pressure?

Will Taylor look to play the role of counter-puncher, or take the fight to Kessler?

[Dan...]

Give us a stylistic analysis.

How will each one look to control the fight?

Will Kessler try and hold centre ring with his jab, or come forward, applying continual pressure?

Will Taylor look to play the role of counter-puncher, or take the fight to Kessler?

Take your logical analysis and **** off out of my thread Mexican.

[Flawless]

Anyone who saw those fights knows Hopkins got cheated

People could argue that Hopkins got cheated against Calzaghe. Move on

[Flawless]

Along with almost losing to 3 Jr Middleweights in a row.

Calzaghe almost lost to a 43 year old man