When Is there going to be a WW Ring Championship fight???
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Then what makes it such a "bad belt" All the other belts are corrupt.
Guzman admitted that the WBO said that if he were to give up his 130 belt (AKA Frank Warren paid the WBO so Alex Arthur could have it) he'd automatically become the WBO mandatory at 135.
The WBC ****ed up the Rudy Lopez-Matsuda situation and favored lopez. WBA has their horrible super champ bull****. The IBF had that scandal in the 90s.
And all the sanctioning bodies have terrible ratings.Comment
-
Are you really 15? lol, anyway if we are going to tarnish the belts, the Ring mag is the sorriest title of them all. Ring mag going back to the 1900's did nothing for fighters of color so you can bring up corruption of any of the sanctioning bodies and their flaws all you want. The Ring title historically has just as much corruption as any organization. I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions.Then what makes it such a "bad belt" All the other belts are corrupt.
Guzman admitted that the WBO said that if he were to give up his 130 belt (AKA Frank Warren paid the WBO so Alex Arthur could have it) he'd automatically become the WBO mandatory at 135.
The WBC ****ed up the Rudy Lopez-Matsuda situation and favored lopez. WBA has their horrible super champ bull****. The IBF had that scandal in the 90s.
And all the sanctioning bodies have terrible ratings.Comment
-
No it doesn't. The corruption in the 40s and stuff was the IBC and the NYSAC for being run by mob dealers. Nothing for color fighters? That's the racist manager faults for not setting up fights aginst black fighters. Nat Fleschier was never a racist. When a black fighter (Jack Johnson,Joe Louis, Panama Al Brown, etc) became a champion, they ranked him. Also they ranked many black fighters in their top ten rankings.Are you really 15? lol, anyway if we are going to tarnish the belts, the Ring mag is the sorriest title of them all. Ring mag going back to the 1900's did nothing for fighters of color so you can bring up corruption of any of the sanctioning bodies and their flaws all you want. The Ring title historically has just as much corruption as any organization. I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions.
Jack Dempsey, Champion
Harry Wills
Gene Tunney
Jack Renault
Bud Gorman
George Godfrey
Jack Sharkey
Bob Fitzsimmons
Paolino Uzcudun
Jim Maloney
Harry Persson
King Solomon
Johnny Risko
Ray Neuman
Jim Keeley
Here's them being racist to Harry Wills in 1925 by ranking him over Gene Tunney and Bob Fitzsimmons.Comment
-
Warp, I think you need a history lesson on boxing. This gloss over you just did does not only make sense, but it doesn't even talk about fighters like Moore not getting a title shot until he was almost old, and the countless fighters who also did not get a chance to figh for the title AT ALL!No it doesn't. The corruption in the 40s and stuff was the IBC and the NYSAC for being run by mob dealers. Nothing for color fighters? That's the racist manager faults for not setting up fights aginst black fighters. Nat Fleschier was never a racist. When a black fighter (Jack Johnson,Joe Louis, Panama Al Brown, etc) became a champion, they ranked him. Also they ranked many black fighters in their top ten rankings.
Jack Dempsey, Champion
Harry Wills
Gene Tunney
Jack Renault
Bud Gorman
George Godfrey
Jack Sharkey
Bob Fitzsimmons
Paolino Uzcudun
Jim Maloney
Harry Persson
King Solomon
Johnny Risko
Ray Neuman
Jim Keeley
Here's them being racist to Harry Wills in 1925 by ranking him over Gene Tunney and Bob Fitzsimmons.Comment
-
Yeah I've only made like 3 different threads on Charley Burley...
Moore didn't get a shot, but that has nothing to do with The Ring being racist. The Ring doesn't enforce mandatories and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Back then there were no things as mandatories.
They still ranked black fighters in their top 10. As you can see with Wills being ranked over Gene Tunney.Comment
-
You just posted some bologna lol. Wills didn't even get a title shot. Nobody is calling anyone racist. I know what a racist is.Yeah I've only made like 3 different threads on Charley Burley...
Moore didn't get a shot, but that has nothing to do with The Ring being racist. The Ring doesn't enforce mandatories and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Back then there were no things as mandatories.
They still ranked black fighters in their top 10. As you can see with Wills being ranked over Gene Tunney.Comment
-
You said:
"The Ring historically just as much corruption..."
So then I brought up the IBC and the NYSAC being owned by mob dealers.
"The Ring did nothing for black fighters"
Then I list them being ranked in the top 10 and even gave you a case where a black fighter was ranked over a white one.
"I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions."
It is an official belt. Maybe they should charge 3% of a boxer's purse and assign bogus mandatories like Morrade Hakkar and Gary Lockett so they can be hmm?Comment
-
Comment
Comment