When Is there going to be a WW Ring Championship fight???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fox McCloud
    Mission Complete!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 18176
    • 789
    • 1,151
    • 26,037

    #21
    Originally posted by Boofdatruth
    Just a question, but what made you respond in this manner? Was it a post I responded to in this thread? Dios is mad because I exlaxed on his tight faced pig in his Avy. As for the rest of your post, Freddy Kruger once said, "Who gives a !@#$$# what you think"!
    Idk, it was nothing personal. I just saw them and thought to myself that I don't think they are that hot. Just felt like responding with it.

    Chill out. I know you don't care what I think.

    Comment

    • Boofdatruth
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 6304
      • 87
      • 0
      • 6,350

      #22
      Originally posted by DWiens421
      Idk, it was nothing personal. I just saw them and thought to myself that I don't think they are that hot. Just felt like responding with it.

      Chill out. I know you don't care what I think.
      To each his own.

      Comment

      • warp1432
        the mailman
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 14406
        • 478
        • 347
        • 24,060

        #23
        Originally posted by Boofdatruth
        Nobody said Dlh influenced the ratings.
        Then what makes it such a "bad belt" All the other belts are corrupt.

        Guzman admitted that the WBO said that if he were to give up his 130 belt (AKA Frank Warren paid the WBO so Alex Arthur could have it) he'd automatically become the WBO mandatory at 135.

        The WBC ****ed up the Rudy Lopez-Matsuda situation and favored lopez. WBA has their horrible super champ bull****. The IBF had that scandal in the 90s.

        And all the sanctioning bodies have terrible ratings.

        Comment

        • Boofdatruth
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 6304
          • 87
          • 0
          • 6,350

          #24
          Originally posted by warp1432
          Then what makes it such a "bad belt" All the other belts are corrupt.

          Guzman admitted that the WBO said that if he were to give up his 130 belt (AKA Frank Warren paid the WBO so Alex Arthur could have it) he'd automatically become the WBO mandatory at 135.

          The WBC ****ed up the Rudy Lopez-Matsuda situation and favored lopez. WBA has their horrible super champ bull****. The IBF had that scandal in the 90s.

          And all the sanctioning bodies have terrible ratings.
          Are you really 15? lol, anyway if we are going to tarnish the belts, the Ring mag is the sorriest title of them all. Ring mag going back to the 1900's did nothing for fighters of color so you can bring up corruption of any of the sanctioning bodies and their flaws all you want. The Ring title historically has just as much corruption as any organization. I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions.

          Comment

          • warp1432
            the mailman
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 14406
            • 478
            • 347
            • 24,060

            #25
            Originally posted by Boofdatruth
            Are you really 15? lol, anyway if we are going to tarnish the belts, the Ring mag is the sorriest title of them all. Ring mag going back to the 1900's did nothing for fighters of color so you can bring up corruption of any of the sanctioning bodies and their flaws all you want. The Ring title historically has just as much corruption as any organization. I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions.
            No it doesn't. The corruption in the 40s and stuff was the IBC and the NYSAC for being run by mob dealers. Nothing for color fighters? That's the racist manager faults for not setting up fights aginst black fighters. Nat Fleschier was never a racist. When a black fighter (Jack Johnson,Joe Louis, Panama Al Brown, etc) became a champion, they ranked him. Also they ranked many black fighters in their top ten rankings.

            Jack Dempsey, Champion
            Harry Wills
            Gene Tunney
            Jack Renault
            Bud Gorman
            George Godfrey
            Jack Sharkey
            Bob Fitzsimmons
            Paolino Uzcudun
            Jim Maloney
            Harry Persson
            King Solomon
            Johnny Risko
            Ray Neuman
            Jim Keeley

            Here's them being racist to Harry Wills in 1925 by ranking him over Gene Tunney and Bob Fitzsimmons.

            Comment

            • Boofdatruth
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 6304
              • 87
              • 0
              • 6,350

              #26
              Originally posted by warp1432
              No it doesn't. The corruption in the 40s and stuff was the IBC and the NYSAC for being run by mob dealers. Nothing for color fighters? That's the racist manager faults for not setting up fights aginst black fighters. Nat Fleschier was never a racist. When a black fighter (Jack Johnson,Joe Louis, Panama Al Brown, etc) became a champion, they ranked him. Also they ranked many black fighters in their top ten rankings.

              Jack Dempsey, Champion
              Harry Wills
              Gene Tunney
              Jack Renault
              Bud Gorman
              George Godfrey
              Jack Sharkey
              Bob Fitzsimmons
              Paolino Uzcudun
              Jim Maloney
              Harry Persson
              King Solomon
              Johnny Risko
              Ray Neuman
              Jim Keeley

              Here's them being racist to Harry Wills in 1925 by ranking him over Gene Tunney and Bob Fitzsimmons.
              Warp, I think you need a history lesson on boxing. This gloss over you just did does not only make sense, but it doesn't even talk about fighters like Moore not getting a title shot until he was almost old, and the countless fighters who also did not get a chance to figh for the title AT ALL!

              Comment

              • warp1432
                the mailman
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 14406
                • 478
                • 347
                • 24,060

                #27
                Yeah I've only made like 3 different threads on Charley Burley...

                Moore didn't get a shot, but that has nothing to do with The Ring being racist. The Ring doesn't enforce mandatories and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Back then there were no things as mandatories.

                They still ranked black fighters in their top 10. As you can see with Wills being ranked over Gene Tunney.

                Comment

                • Boofdatruth
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 6304
                  • 87
                  • 0
                  • 6,350

                  #28
                  Originally posted by warp1432
                  Yeah I've only made like 3 different threads on Charley Burley...

                  Moore didn't get a shot, but that has nothing to do with The Ring being racist. The Ring doesn't enforce mandatories and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Back then there were no things as mandatories.

                  They still ranked black fighters in their top 10. As you can see with Wills being ranked over Gene Tunney.
                  You just posted some bologna lol. Wills didn't even get a title shot. Nobody is calling anyone racist. I know what a racist is.

                  Comment

                  • warp1432
                    the mailman
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 14406
                    • 478
                    • 347
                    • 24,060

                    #29
                    You said:

                    "The Ring historically just as much corruption..."

                    So then I brought up the IBC and the NYSAC being owned by mob dealers.

                    "The Ring did nothing for black fighters"

                    Then I list them being ranked in the top 10 and even gave you a case where a black fighter was ranked over a white one.


                    "I don't recognize the belt because it isn't an official belt. If we go by the ring belt, we might as well go back to 8 divisions."

                    It is an official belt. Maybe they should charge 3% of a boxer's purse and assign bogus mandatories like Morrade Hakkar and Gary Lockett so they can be hmm?

                    Comment

                    • warp1432
                      the mailman
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 14406
                      • 478
                      • 347
                      • 24,060

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Boofdatruth
                      You just posted some bologna lol. Wills didn't even get a title shot. Nobody is calling anyone racist. I know what a racist is.
                      AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE RING.

                      How is that corruption by the ring's part? When was The Ring belt ever corrupted? You said it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP