Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Wladimir Klitschko a boring fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Tunney View Post
    He's far from a being a boring fighter. The Ibragimov fight wasn't as bad as people say, and if you watch Briggs vs. Ibragimov, you'll realize it was Sultan's fault not Wlad's that it wasn't exciting.

    I love KOs, and Wlad has given me a lot of them over the years!

    Partly because of his one-punch KO power, and also because of his superior technical boxing skills, Wlad is very exciting to watch.
    It kind of was.

    Comment


    • #12
      last couple of fights, yeah.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
        I enjoy watching Wlad dominate and KO his opponents

        Wlad has 45 KO's in his 51 wins

        He has KO'd 90% OF HIS OPPONENTS

        If you want to see a Talented Boxer/Big Puncher that knocks people out....go watch Wlad.
        Mate , KO percentages have nothing to do with boring/exciting. A fight that goes to decision is just as likely to be as exciting as one that ends in a KO.

        I do agree all these complaints about Wladimir is quite ridiculous. He's had some boring fights lately but that's because they were not talented enough to challenge Wlad who had the superior skills. Plus it didn't help that the opponents he faced were awkward fighters.

        Comment


        • #14
          I thought the Peter fight was thrilling.

          Thompson and Ibragimov didn't exactly bring it, now did they?

          I want Wlad in with someone who will bring it, and get inside and make him trade.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
            I thought the Peter fight was thrilling.

            Thompson and Ibragimov didn't exactly bring it, now did they?

            I want Wlad in with someone who will bring it, and get inside and make him trade.
            Lads who come to fight Wlad not to lose instead of actually trying to beat Wlad makes not so exciting bouts.

            Peter-Wlad was quite entertaining because for all his limitations as a fighter the Nigerian actually does try to win the fight or at least hurt Wlad.

            Comment


            • #16
              Not boring but could be more exciting with all out attacks in one round and no grapping when you are the bigger man

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Flawless View Post
                Not boring but could be more exciting with all out attacks in one round and no grapping when you are the bigger man
                That's how he lost his 3 bouts , mate.

                He got caught by Corrie and ran out of steam against Ross and Lamon because of his all out attacks. These fights are also the reason he learned to clinch. He really didn't know how to clinch before when he was hurt.

                Kid , you were ridiculing Wladimir because of his losses but you say he should fight the way he did when he got those losses?

                Have you ever seen Wlad fights from a few years ago before he changed his fighting style? Have you seen his losses to Ross , Corrie and Lamon?

                If you have , then I don't know where and how you come to your conclusions.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                  I thought the Peter fight was thrilling.

                  Thompson and Ibragimov didn't exactly bring it, now did they?

                  I want Wlad in with someone who will bring it, and get inside and make him trade.
                  Two awkward southpaws in a row, some people might think he's boring. Truth is, most of the time he knocks someone the hell out. And I think the fact that his chin isn't the greatest, makes his fights that much more interesting. You're almost guaranteed a KO one way or the other. I mean if the guy had a chin like McCall, no one would stand a chance against him, and what fun is that?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by All Blacks View Post
                    That's how he lost his 3 bouts , mate.

                    He got caught by Corrie and ran out of steam against Ross and Lamon because of his all out attacks. These fights are also the reason he learned to clinch. He really didn't know how to clinch before when he was hurt.

                    Kid , you were ridiculing Wladimir because of his losses but you say he should fight the way he did when he got those losses?

                    Have you ever seen Wlad fights from a few years ago before he changed his fighting style? Have you seen his losses to Ross , Corrie and Lamon?

                    If you have , then I don't know where and how you come to your conclusions.
                    I know you only just started posting so I will give you a valuable and time-saving piece of advice:

                    Do not attempt to debate with Flawless.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by danc1984 View Post
                      I know you only just started posting so I will give you a valuable and time-saving piece of advice:

                      Do not attempt to debate with Flawless.
                      I'm starting to get that feeling.

                      This is the 3rd thread in the last 15 minutes or so where I have seen him post something totally senseless and beyond reason. I feel he is either just poking fun or quite unknowledgable about the sport.

                      I might take your advice , mate. Much appreciated.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP