There is little middle ground on this fight. I can't remember too many people who thought this fight could have gone either way and/or thought the right man won. You either thought Whitaker won and was robbed or thought Ramirez won. You already know the popular opinion here. The 5 or so posters who have come through this thread saying they thought Whitaker was robbed obviously reinforces that notion.
I have had arguments before like this with other posters on this site. Most recently on Toney/Griffin II. It really got to the point where we were debating the effectiveness of jabs to convince each other about rounds won....going RBR, punch for punch. Pretty sad. I don't have the energy to do that here, but I will still maintain my opinion of Whitaker winning that fight by a relatively comfortable margin.
At least you presented an argument though. Better than "Whitaker ran that whole fight"...a personal favorite of mine.
I have had arguments before like this with other posters on this site. Most recently on Toney/Griffin II. It really got to the point where we were debating the effectiveness of jabs to convince each other about rounds won....going RBR, punch for punch. Pretty sad. I don't have the energy to do that here, but I will still maintain my opinion of Whitaker winning that fight by a relatively comfortable margin.
At least you presented an argument though. Better than "Whitaker ran that whole fight"...a personal favorite of mine.
Comment