so who are the most biased fans?

[keepthemhandsup]

so..i've been on the borad for a while...who are the most biased for all fans?

to me...it a tie between mayweather fan, calzaghe fan and wald fans......but i can understand wald fans since its really no one in the division that worth mentioning (well a few but not alot) and now that someone actully pose's a threat....they worry about their champ.

calzaghe fan...no offense...but i haven't really see him fight anyone in their prime...sure he fought hop but hop is past his prime.....not that i'm saying he's a bad boxer...just he hadn't fought anyone for me to put him at #2 for a p4p great....

mayweather fans...i like mayweather for what he did in the ring....but i'm going to be honest....for a guy who is so skilled and deserved to had been p4p #1....he did ducked alot of competion.....

you can say i'm wrong but thats how i feel......

[Floyd Sinclair]

calzaghe fans...

[The Gully Gad]

Pac's ******* fans are bad also..

It has to be Vlad's

[kayjay]

Go away, kid.

What is the point of this question?

Don't answer, just conveniently forget your password

[Dan...]

It really is pretty close. You can make a case for pretty much all types of fans being the most biased. THere are some amoung each fan base that are ridiculous.

Some of the British guys go way over the top, they just refuse to see sense on any topic and just side with the Brit regardless.

Some of the Mexicans overdo it also. A good example is claiming that Margarito would have beaten Hearns at WW.

Wlad has his overly biased fans also.

The Americans can also be pretty biased. An example is several stating that Calzaghe has never beaten anybody, he slaps etc etc. They label top guys like Kessler a complete bum.

So basically I think boxing fans in general are extremely biased, regardless which fighter they follow.

[keepthemhandsup]

Go away, kid.

What is the point of this question?

Don't answer, just conveniently forget your password

*shrugs sholders* just wanted people opnions....

[ottoevans]

Margarito was god to all his fans before the Cotto fight, and hadnt even fougt anything one yet besides Paul. So my vote goes there.

Even tho i hate him, Mayweather is undefeated and the best. So u cant hate.

Calzghae, Wlad the same. And cott was the same

Haye is still unproven and has a lose, no reason to have fans

Wlad

[The Gully Gad]

Haye is still unproven and has a lose, no reason to have fans

hehehehe...

[Ryn0]

There all terrible but Cotto, Haye fans are the least nuthuggy of all of them

[keepthemhandsup]

It really is pretty close. You can make a case for pretty much all types of fans being the most biased. THere are some amoung each fan base that are ridiculous.

Some of the British guys go way over the top, they just refuse to see sense on any topic and just side with the Brit regardless.

Some of the Mexicans overdo it also. A good example is claiming that Margarito would have beaten Hearns at WW.

Wlad has his overly biased fans also.

The Americans can also be pretty biased. An example is several stating that Calzaghe has never beaten anybody, he slaps etc etc. They label top guys like Kessler a complete bum.

So basically I think boxing fans in general are extremely biased, regardless which fighter they follow.

so it probaly nationally that adds to the biased-ness of people...i understand that.....