Pro fighters with no amateur experience

[ironalex]

black ink he had 16 apparntly 13-3.

and squabbles i tottally disagree with your comment. look at all the fighters i previously mentioned, chavez and duran are 2 of the most succesful latino fighters of all time, chavez didnt need no amateur system, and duran had a limited backround. obviosuly its easier if u are a succesful amateur because u will get matched and get a better contract when u turn pro, but does not mean u are a better fighter nor that people will "associate with u more" who do people assosiate more to roberto duran or dominick guinn who had 400 am fights. lol. the am system is piss poor to say the least atm. btw anthony mundine-best australian fighter bar tzyu. billy conn ledgend, archie moore 1 of the best who ever lived, marciano 1 of the great heavys, duran 1 of the best who ever lived, and chavez(0 am fights) one of the best too...

[ironalex]

Iron Alex....people SEVERELY underestimate Tyson's amateur career...Mike was a national champion, won some big tournaments, fought internationally, and beat some of the top amateurs in the USA in his amateur career.

yes i agree scully but the fact remains he didnt have a lot of am fights, but yeah his level of competiton was good so ur right. but the other people on my list achire moore, marciano, chavez sr, duran, mundine all had very very lil mundine and chavez sr having none.