RJ is going to make calslappy cry like a little girl

[abadger]

Umm, are you dense?

Why the day after? TODAY, AS I TYPE, Roy Jones is considered old, washed up, and shot.

Get real.

You are so rude IMDAZED, and incredibly biased. Here we are in thread entitled "RJ is going to make calslappy cry like a little girl" in which a bunch of Roy fans state pretty clearly that Roy is going to win, and the person you jump on for bring "dense" is the Calzaghe fan who points out that Roy winning is quite unlikely and that the Roy fans will change their tune after the fight.

[IMDAZED]

You are so rude IMDAZED, and incredibly biased. Here we are in thread entitled "RJ is going to make calslappy cry like a little girl" in which a bunch of Roy fans state pretty clearly that Roy is going to win, and the person you jump on for bring "dense" is the Calzaghe fan who points out that Roy winning is quite unlikely and that the Roy fans will change their tune after the fight.

I thought you were gonna stop talking to me? Ever since I called you out for saying Chad Dawson is no different than Jeff Lacy? And I'm incredibly biased...


And, lastly, how dare YOU create this post since YOU are one of the people going around saying Jones is shot, finished, etc. Which is the general consensus, BTW. Or have you now changed your mind upon realizing Joe C won't get much credit for beating a shot fighter?

[abadger]

I thought you were gonna stop talking to me? Ever since I called you out for saying Chad Dawson is no different than Jeff Lacy? And I'm incredibly biased...


And, lastly, how dare YOU create this post since YOU are one of the people going around saying Jones is shot, finished, etc. Which is the general consensus, BTW. Or have you now changed your mind upon realizing Joe C won't get much credit for beating a shot fighter?

I stopped posting with you because of your attitude. Lacy was a well regarded young champ before he met Calzaghe, exactly like Dawson is now. He isn't/ wasn't as good, but what would happen if Calzaghe gave Dawson an ass-whooping? You get the point.

I don't get what you mean about "how dare I make this post" my view hasn't changed, Jones is IMO too old to compete with Calzaghe.

[IMDAZED]

I stopped posting with you because of your attitude. Lacy was a well regarded young champ before he met Calzaghe, exactly like Dawson is now. He isn't/ wasn't as good, but what would happen if Calzaghe gave Dawson an ass-whooping? You get the point.

I don't get what you mean about "how dare I make this post" my view hasn't changed, Jones is IMO too old to compete with Calzaghe.

Yes, and you've also mentioned on PLENTY of occassions that he's shot.

RIGHT OR WRONG?

And you see no problem with making the post you made? Sure.

And finally, if you think Jeff Lacy is comparable to Chad Dawson, you're not too bright. Being a young champ doesn't mean they compare. There are a lot of young champs, how general is that?? Floyd Mayweather was one just a few years ago - I suppose Lacy compared to him? Please.

[abadger]

Yes, and you've also mentioned on PLENTY of occassions that he's shot.

RIGHT OR WRONG?

And you see no problem with making the post you made? Sure.

And finally, if you think Jeff Lacy is comparable to Chad Dawson, you're not too bright. Being a young champ doesn't mean they compare. There are a lot of young champs, how general is that?? Floyd Mayweather was one just a few years ago - I suppose Lacy compared to him? Please.

Yes, he is shot. IMO Calzaghe will beat him easily.

Please stop reading what you want to read. You choose to interpret the Lacy/ Dawson thing as me saying Lacy = Dawson. That isn't what I'm saying. What I am saying is that just like Dawson Lacy was a well regarded young champ, as was Kessler. Calzaghe faced and beat them both, there is little different going into a Dawson fight than there was in either of those. Instead of trying to pick holes in everything anyone ever says to you and imposing your own interpretation on people's words in order to tell them they are dumb, why not just relax a little bit?

[IMDAZED]

Yes, he is shot. IMO Calzaghe will beat him easily.

Please stop reading what you want to read. You choose to interpret the Lacy/ Dawson thing as me saying Lacy = Dawson. That isn't what I'm saying. What I am saying is that just like Dawson Lacy was a well regarded young champ, as was Kessler. Calzaghe faced and beat them both, there is little different going into a Dawson fight than there was in either of those. Instead of trying to pick holes in everything anyone ever says to you and imposing your own interpretation on people's words in order to tell them they are dumb, why not just relax a little bit?

No, I read quite well. I believe you said, "I SEE NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LACY AND DAWSON."

How do you interpret that?

Go away. Watching you backtrack is disgusting.

First you won't write me anymore (WAAHHH).

Then you change your mind.

First there's no difference between Lacy & Dawson.

Now Dawson is better.

Anything else?

[Stickman]

You two bicker back and forth like you're married.

To disagree is not to despise. Amiable, intelligent people disagree every day and manage to not hate each other.

[IMDAZED]

You two bicker back and forth like you're married.

To disagree is not to despise. Amiable, intelligent people disagree every day and manage to not hate each other.

Agreed.

If I knew the poster personally, I may hate. Until then, no one can move me that much. Some people tend to catch feelings. This is a message board - either you come up with a better argument or you let it go. All this "I'm not talking to you anymore" **** should stay in elementary school. Especially when you'll renege in weeks.

[Fenom]

im huuuuuuuungry

[abadger]

No, I read quite well. I believe you said, "I SEE NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LACY AND DAWSON."

How do you interpret that?

Go away. Watching you backtrack is disgusting.

First you won't write me anymore (WAAHHH).

Then you change your mind.

First there's no difference between Lacy & Dawson.

Now Dawson is better.

Anything else?

But that isn't what I said. We were talking about whether or not Calzaghe should fight Dawson, and I pointed out that the circumstances that suggest Calzaghe should fight Dawson are the same as those that said he should fight Lacy and Kessler, that Dawson is a young prime champ. Calzaghe has been there before.

I don't really see what you get out of posting in the aggressive way you do, for you to be 'right' you would have to think that I believe Dawson and Lacy are equally good. Do you? I also mentioned Kessler in the same post, but you have chosen to overlook that in favour of Lacy only. Why? I think its because you're only interest in posting here is to attempt to 'PWN' people, which is a shame because you do have quite a lot of factual knowledge about boxing, and it would be much better if you could use it to enter into rational discussion rather than pointless argument.