Who's a Better Fighter: Pavlik or Kessler?
Collapse
-
As I said, Taylor is just ONE opponent. One opponent is not grounds to say that one guys record is much better. Kessler's list from Siaca to Andrade is better than Pavlik's previous to Taylor easily.I think you overrate Mikkel's resume a little badger. Kelly's is not fantastic either but in my view having Taylor times 2 on it does make it a lot better than Kessler's. Kessler's best win is Mundine. His other notable wins are Andrade (tough but ordinary), Beyer (an overprotected fighter who did not even go out there to win the fight anyway), Siaca (a reasonable but very beatable fighter), Lucas (similar to Siaca in that he is reasonable but very beatable) and Sartison. This is not the resume of a borderline top 10 p4p figher in my view.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
And here's the "Kessler's biggest accomplishment is his loss to the great Calzaghe" argument again... hahaha.
Did you know that Japan's biggest victory was its loss to the U.S. in WWII? Only nuclear weapons could defeat it. It got blowed the **** up, but still...Comment
-
I'm not a boxer, but I would imagine it's more difficult to beat one really good fighter than it is to beat a few OK fighters.
Plus Pavlik is looking to add another decent name to his resume, then another, and another... and who exactly is Kessler planning to fight next? Was it the baker or the candlestick maker?Comment
-
You is a biased Yank. PWNI'm not a boxer, but I would imagine it's more difficult to beat one really good fighter than it is to beat a few OK fighters.
Plus Pavlik is looking to add another decent name to his resume, then another, and another... and who exactly is Kessler planning to fight next? Was it the baker or the candlestick maker?Comment
Comment