Who the better boxer: Cotto vs. Kessler

[Flawless.]

Who the better boxer: Cotto vs. Kessler

I know Cotto has a better resume, but is he a better boxer than Mikkel Kessler, I don't think so.

I had to make this thread, because of this statement. No way is Kessler the better boxer than Cotto. You wonder why people hate Calzaghe and his fans for outrageous statements

When answering the poll is just about boxing. Not resume or achievements.


Please give me your insight into the hot issue in the boxing world


Discuss

[Flawless.]

This is based on boxing ability alone but not there past records

[Flawless.]

Don’t blast me and say what a ****** poll.

[Flawless.]

abadger can I get yout thoughts on why you voted Kessler

[jmmfan]

Could you whore your post count anymore? God damn. Shut up.

[Mafcherano]

Kessler has beaten nobody. He has fought nobody. Calslappy is a nobody.

Cotto got found out but beat some big names along the way. Calslappy fans are just gay and will claim he is fighting a prime Roy Jones this Novemeber if he wins.

[abadger]

I'm sure we will see a huge majority in favour of Cotto. It doesn't concern me and I have no problem holding a minority opinion.

As I asked you in the other thread, if Cotto is such a talanted boxer, how come he lost to one of the slowest and most predictable fighters in elite boxing today? If his talent is all that good, surely he should have been able to outbox him?

[Silencers]

I think Kessler is a textbook boxer, if you want to learn how to box, you watch Kessler, he pretty much does everything textbook.

[Murray]

Depends on who they are fighting, doesnt it? I think Cotto is more successful as a brawler or when he work offense so Im going with Kessler.

[abadger]

abadger can I get yout thoughts on why you voted Kessler

Yes, Mikkel Kessler is one of the best orthodox boxers I've ever seen in my life. He is powerful, fast and rarely makes a technical mistake.

Can I get yours on why you think Cotto is?