"The IBO belts are a joke."

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RMAcero
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 433
    • 7
    • 22
    • 6,732

    #11
    The WBO was jack until its champions started gaining noteriety. Same thing with the IBO, if its champs are no good, then it has no credibilty. I don't see it having the same luck as the WBO, it will probably never make it. From what I have read, the IBO's claim to fame is that it has unbiased, computerized rankings for every decision. I am, however, down with that.

    Comment

    • -Swizzy-
      The Wolf
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 8821
      • 431
      • 330
      • 661,075

      #12
      Originally posted by Stuntin
      Why do many boxing fans seem to believe this?
      I think the IBO has the best ranking system by far. infact, the ranking system of all the other boxing organizations is a joke compared to the IBO's. Its too bad that belt isn't nearly as respected.

      Comment

      • THe TRiNiTY
        Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 10079
        • 405
        • 103
        • 17,986

        #13
        Originally posted by kswizzy99
        I think the IBO has the best ranking system by far. infact, the ranking system of all the other boxing organizations is a joke compared to the IBO's. Its too bad that belt isn't nearly as respected.
        The Ring Belts > All other belts.

        Comment

        • ColWallace
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 839
          • 53
          • 12
          • 7,627

          #14
          Originally posted by Derranged
          I couldnt tell the difference between one sanctioning body from another. I have no idea what makes one better than the other.
          Thats exactly how I feel. The IBF formed to retain the 15-round format, but that isn't happening anymore.

          Thus, none of it means **** anymore. And that's a good thing, because as more fans disregard the bodies, the best have to fight the best to prove where they stand. The supposedly 'mythical' p4p rankings are usually far more accurate than those of the bodies sanctioning world title fights.

          The recent Billy Dib fight did nothing for the reputation of the IBO belt. You gotta have the winner winning in title fights to have some integrity.

          It's all about having the most accurate consensus on who is the best. And boxing folks being so, businesses have formed and given false meaning to meaningless fights.

          That doesn't mean the Katsidis-Diaz clash won't be an awesome fight next month. The quality of both guys brings prestige to the IBO belt.

          Col

          Comment

          • RMAcero
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 433
            • 7
            • 22
            • 6,732

            #15
            Originally posted by ..Calderon...
            The Ring Belts > All other belts.
            True dat, too bad that so many belts are given out and so many champions are named that half the Ring belts are vacant.

            Comment

            • sugarshanenas
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 1273
              • 45
              • 50
              • 7,708

              #16
              Originally posted by Stuntin
              Why do many boxing fans seem to believe this?

              for some reason your avatar always makes me laugh lol

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP