Resume Question?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Cotto didint face better opposition at 140, 140 is a mess to this day, the only credible fight that took place there for the longest was hatton/tszyu, everyone else was just a belt holder and that includes cotto, alot of his 140 opponents were common fights that floyd had, there is no way cottos resume is better at 140, its largely the ****ing same, with floyds common opponents aged.Comment
-
Floyd had only 3 fights at 140. Corly/Bruseles/Gatti.Cotto didint face better opposition at 140, 140 is a mess to this day, the only credible fight that took place there for the longest was hatton/tszyu, everyone else was just a belt holder and that includes cotto, alot of his 140 opponents were common fights that floyd had, there is no way cottos resume is better at 140, its largely the ****ing same, with floyds common opponents aged.
Cotto has had over 15 fights at 140, including wins over Malignaggi, and Torres. Those 2 wins alone are better than anything Floyd has done at 140.
So please explain how Floyd's resume is better than Cotto's at 140 again??Comment
-
I am not saying its better, but i am saying Cottos resume at 140 means very little to me in comparison to floyd save for malignaggi and torres mostly because they share far too many common opponents who started at 130/135 in comparison to floyd. If you want to sit there and say Cottos resume is better than floyds at 147 i would agree, but at 140, most of those guys werent even natural lightweights and had already fought floyd years earlier.Floyd had only 3 fights at 140. Corly/Bruseles/Gatti.
Cotto has had over 15 fights at 140, including wins over Malignaggi, and Torres. Those 2 wins alone are better than anything Floyd has done at 140.
So please explain how Floyd's resume is better than Cotto's at 140 again??Comment
Comment