Well you can believe that all you want but we all know what happend and Tito knows it too. That's a big reason he wanted no part of the DLH rematch, his father knew it, everyone knew it.
I think in the history and legacy of boxing, DLH will be higher up on the list than Tito. Tito was a power puncher but wasn't the boxer DLH was and the fact that the poster said you never knew what you were going to get with DLH, shows his diversity and ability to change from fight to fight.
I don't think DLH created a crowd pleasing style, I actually think the opposite. When you really think about it, DLH either won convincingly or lost convincingly. He had very few fights where it was a war and you didn't know who to pick in the fight.
The Mosley fights were close but other than that I think he dominated Tito for 8 rounds, lost clearly to Hopkins but really didn't have that great, career defining fight like other legends have had.
His best fight IMO was against Quartey, where they were going back and forth until DLH put him on his back in the last round. For me, that was his most entertaining fight by far.
I think in the history and legacy of boxing, DLH will be higher up on the list than Tito. Tito was a power puncher but wasn't the boxer DLH was and the fact that the poster said you never knew what you were going to get with DLH, shows his diversity and ability to change from fight to fight.
I don't think DLH created a crowd pleasing style, I actually think the opposite. When you really think about it, DLH either won convincingly or lost convincingly. He had very few fights where it was a war and you didn't know who to pick in the fight.
The Mosley fights were close but other than that I think he dominated Tito for 8 rounds, lost clearly to Hopkins but really didn't have that great, career defining fight like other legends have had.
His best fight IMO was against Quartey, where they were going back and forth until DLH put him on his back in the last round. For me, that was his most entertaining fight by far.

Comment