How do you rate Jermain Taylor as a boxer?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #51
    Originally posted by dstew
    Belittle Taylor who's fought champions his past seven fights, by dismissing the quality of his opposition and then questioning his decisions against top opposition, and then belittle Pavlik's boxing skill, who is only "limited" in the fact that he's not got lightening fast hands... he's actually a very good technical boxer, he just looks awkward because of his dimensions...

    All while saying Hopkins should have gotten the win over Taylor, which is likely meant to credit Calzaghe for his own win over Hopkins, and then going on to hype the typical European names, who if anything have made their own "careers" off knocking out bums.

    *yawn*
    I never dismissed the quality of his opposition which has been top quality recently. But for me, he hasnt beat a world class opponent because he lost to both Hopkins and Wright.

    I said he built up his reputation by KOing Light middleweights which he did before fighting Hopkins. As soon as he stepped up to classy opponents, his power disappeared, he seemed mentally not there and he was getting schooled by better fighters.

    Pavlik is technially limited, he doesnt do anything fancy. A boxer with Taylor's technical pedigree should be able to outbox him. He improved a lot in the second fight so he deserves credit for that but he still got beat.

    Im saying Hopkins beat him because thats how I scored it. Several other people did so too.

    Typical lazy American stereotyping. Why the **** would I care about "European fighters"?? Im British not Danish or Romanian. We're not all the same. I just think most top supermiddleweights would beat Taylor right now. He has no pedigree at the weight, had no power against top oppents at 160 and is mentally pretty weak.

    If Pavlik could outbox him and knock him out then Kessler -who is technically superior to Pavlik - would most likely do the same or at least decision him. Froch is a little less clear cut as he hasnt been tested at that level yet but Taylor obviously finds him a threat.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #52
      Originally posted by Bea5T
      hate is strong here


      and european bias

      laugh the ****ing out loud
      Laughing out ****ing loud at the typical ignorant American sterotyping.

      European bias?? Im British not European. Why would I give a **** about Kessler or Bute?

      What has Taylor done at 168 to suggest he can beat these guys already? I dont hate Taylor , he's just overrated

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP