Cotto proved he is not a great fighter

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Texasboy34
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2004
    • 1060
    • 75
    • 24
    • 7,620

    #11
    I give him props he fought a good fight, but lost to the better man. If anything he proved he is no 2nd coming of Tito Trinidad.

    How do you think prime 147 version of Tito would have done against last nights Margarito? I bet anything Tony wouldn't have been smiling after he got popped in the mouth like he did to Cotto thats for sure.

    Comment

    • Texanballer
      -Texan For Life-
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 13562
      • 488
      • 681
      • 24,660

      #12
      Originally posted by DiegoFuego
      I totally agree. If you lose to Margarito, there is no way in hell you can be considered a great fighter. Cotto deserved to be p4p based on his accomplishments to that point (boxing isn't exactly deep with talent right now, Kelly Pavlik is in the ****ing top 5), but last night he got knocked right out elite consideration. Anybody with any boxing ability whatsoever who can also take a punch beats Margarito. Cotto is not a great boxer and his chin is pretty weak too. I'm just glad all the Mayweather comparisons are over and done with. Nobody will ever claim this kid had a chance at Floyd again, so this is a good day indeed.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP