the Heavyweight division

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FkDaHtrs
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 824
    • 257
    • 630
    • 8,359

    #51
    Originally posted by Bad-Wlad
    u only specify that because Mike Tyson was no better than Wlad and that is the only thing u can do to try and compare him to Wlad which is clearly lame

    Tyson was overated but he gets more respect than Wlad and he was a convicted rapist
    None of the greats were KO'd that fast. That's why I bring it up.

    Comment

    • Bad-Wlad
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 471
      • 13
      • 3
      • 6,545

      #52
      Originally posted by Ryno113
      If Wlad was more exciting and dominated the Division then he would be celebrated. Tony Thompson is not a valid claim for Wlad's championship claim.
      Tony Thompson peformance is not the yard stick

      Comment

      • Bad-Wlad
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 471
        • 13
        • 3
        • 6,545

        #53
        Originally posted by FkDaHtrs
        Besides Tyson, none of the greats were KO'd that fast. That's why I bring it up.
        it does not make him any greater he was still overated and should of had more than enough left in the tank to beat an old ring worn Evander Holyfield

        i guess u have another excuse for that though ,Don King,Robin Gibbins lol

        Comment

        • -Swizzy-
          The Wolf
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 8821
          • 431
          • 330
          • 661,075

          #54
          Originally posted by Bad-Wlad
          the division is not weak it is ruled by fighters that people know little about their is a big difference
          the ppl in this forum know everything about all the top fighters in the hw division. if there ever was a hw fighter that was really good, they would recognize it.

          wlad lacks alot of skill to be considered a great fighter. and even if his skill is lacking, he could atleast put on a great performance by fighting with heart and guts but the guy fights extremely boring especially against mediocre opponents.

          I understand that it isn't wlad's fault that there isn't much competition in that division but the least he could do is make the most of the fights that he does have. ibragimov and thompson were awful performances.

          Comment

          • Bad-Wlad
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 471
            • 13
            • 3
            • 6,545

            #55
            Originally posted by kswizzy99
            the ppl in this forum know everything about all the top fighters in the hw division. if there ever was a hw fighter that was really good, they would recognize it.

            wlad lacks alot of skill to be considered a great fighter. and even if his skill is lacking, he could atleast put on a great performance by fighting with heart and guts but the guy fights extremely boring especially against mediocre opponents.

            I understand that it isn't wlad's fault that there isn't much competition in that division but the least he could do is make the most of the fights that he does have. ibragimov and thompson were awful performances.

            they will not give Wladimir any recognition cause they have made their minds about him the same way they have with Hatton


            Wladimir does not lack skill he is a very technically skilled Heavyweight ,did the Sam Peter fight not entertain you ?

            it was not Joe Louis fault he faced poor competition but he still got notoriety ,why because he is American

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP