Miguel Cotto Made Floyd Mayweather Retire, Says Arum

[C'MONMANG']

Who said that... you the first who says that. I mean thats simply wrong. There are a lot of mixing the facts out there... but nobody until you now came around says that it should have been a PPV!!! Nobody!!! And as far as I can concern it was never ever mentioned. Not even the other ones with other opinions have said that... so that's again is a dream

And not to forget... that was Zab Judah... I hate to point it out... but to this day Zab Judah is more known and is far more accomplished when it comes to winning championships then Margarito.

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=2420382

[Sox8055]

I dont see mayweather getting beat at 147 wether ppl like him or not he is a bad mofo

[jk4real]

LMAO..

the Rahman fight that replaced it was in fact PPV,,like Arum said.. you are such a dork. you said it had never been mentioned.......

only little cry babies cant admit when they are wrong..typical Floyd fan!

Of course it was never ever mentioned... I'm talking about a unbias source. You probably have no idea of journalism... so let me give you a clue... if there stands according to... it is something that is not a fact. It's a theory from a certain person that the journalist couldn't cover because of different reasons. I don't expect you to understand it.

The Rahman fight was an PPV. Who said that it was an replacement. By the way HBO selects their PPVs it could have been a PPV all the way and the Rahman fight was already set... so that was not a replacement... it was going to happen anyways...

Why I'm wrong??? Why I'm crying??? Don't get your point still... but as long as you happy... you seem to thrive on these internet competitions. It's always nice to see, that some1 who hasn't a social network (which includes parents, friends) gets a chance to be happy. You got to love the internet.

[C'MONMANG']

Of course it was never ever mentioned... I'm talking about a unbias source. You probably have no idea of journalism... so let me give you a clue... if there stands according to... it is something that is not a fact. It's a theory from a certain person that the journalist couldn't cover because of different reasons. I don't expect you to understand it.

The Rahman fight was an PPV. Who said that it was an replacement. By the way HBO selects their PPVs it could have been a PPV all the way and the Rahman fight was already set... so that was not a replacement... it was going to happen anyways...

Why I'm wrong??? Why I'm crying??? Don't get your point still... but as long as you happy... you seem to thrive on these internet competitions. It's always nice to see, that some1 who hasn't a social network (which includes parents, friends) gets a chance to be happy. You got to love the internet.

"it was never mentioned "

[jk4real]

"it was never mentioned "

I will try to explain it in another way... that you understand what I mean with never ever mentioned.

If you do an interview with a promoter and you ask him well you have this boxer would you like him to see box this fighter. The promoter will answer yes, but not now it's in the future. For me if some1 asks me this fight was never mentioned. It's simply a sentence on something that could happen. For you it does mean it was mentioned. And if you take it literally your right. But I thought that you are an adult. Now you are playing a child game... but it's nice that you found one wrong line in all my lines that I wrote... you should be happy... I guess school was really good for you, you really learned something there, and I'm very proud of you.

[Pretty_Hitman]

This is the kinda talk which will bring Mayweather back
Floyd aint losing at 147 either

Marg will do Cotto inside 7

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

Marg Will Do Cotto Inside 7

If That Happens, It Diminishes Cotto More Than It Elevates Margo