Mistakes people make in "scoring" fights
Collapse
-
Harold is not that bad, but like anyone that watches that many fights you get some crazy results. Also with boxing scoring being highly subjective it is easy to see 2 or 3 rounds different. I always like when people make it a big deal about a 8-4 score instead of 7-5, i mean come on that is 1 round different.Comment
-
Harold is not that bad, but like anyone that watches that many fights you get some crazy results. Also with boxing scoring being highlt subjective it is easy to see 2 or 3 rounds different. I always like when people make it a big deal about a 8-4 score instead of 7-5, i mean come on that is 1 round different.
Gotta love boxing!Comment
-
Comment
-
-
I think Harold is one of the worst judges in the game to be honest. Look how he scored Mayweather-Hatton for example. It's gotten to where I'll score a round and tell everyone in the room to watch because Harold is going to score it the other way and say the guy was coming forward. Never failsComment
-
I think Harold is one of the worst judges in the game to be honest. Look how he scored Mayweather-Hatton for example. It's gotten to where I'll score a round and tell everyone in the room to watch because Harold is going to score it the other way and say the guy was coming forward. Never fails
The moral? Harold and I > the massesComment
-
Rare good call by HaroldComment
-
I use the quotes in 'scoring' because what most people do is merely fabricate a number to lend an appearance of justification for their sporting allegiance. Here is a list of common errors, which I'll elaborate with illustrations later.
1. Scoring with respect to style expectation: it's irrelevant to say "so and so is a counterpuncher" to justify inactivity, or "fighter A fought fight fighter B's fight;" you have to score what actually takes place, without reference to what you expected.
2. Watching one fighter only: sometimes an ineffective fighter or round is said to be "setting up" something for later; this makes it clear the poster is only watching one guy, not the whole fight.
3. Scoring missed punches negatively: Ill quote one of my nemeses, Fuego (who scores well, though he's still a ****): "If you make someone miss without throwing back, it doesn't count for anything." Fuego is right about this, which is one reason he usually gets it right.
4. Giving style points: this error is indicated by the frequent phrase "fighter b showed better skills." A fight is not a skills demonstration; you can score ice skating or gymnastics that way, but not boxing.
5. Counting partially-landed punches as a misses
6. Emphasizing punch percentage: sometimes you throw a punch or two to land a different one. It doesn't matter if the first two miss. Total punches landed or partially landed is more important than percentage landed
Marques of Queenberry rules explicitly state that 1/4th of judging a round is based on defense.Comment
Comment