Well, the problem we have then is that the heavyweight rule doesn't make sense to me. The best should be listed.
Regardless, Pavlik beat the TRUE champion, like Hatton did. However, with most traditional p4p lists, you take into consideration the level of opposition, how they beat them, their records, and their upside. In terms of the majority of those categories, I think Pavlik stacks up fairly well with Hatton. He blows him out of the water, however, in terms of upside.
Regardless, Pavlik beat the TRUE champion, like Hatton did. However, with most traditional p4p lists, you take into consideration the level of opposition, how they beat them, their records, and their upside. In terms of the majority of those categories, I think Pavlik stacks up fairly well with Hatton. He blows him out of the water, however, in terms of upside.

Comment