Who has the more tougher resume, DLH or RJJ?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PrettyBoyFloyd7
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 689
    • 27
    • 61
    • 7,019

    #11
    i would say DLH...RJJ got a solid resume too though

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #12
      Are we counting losses as far as resume? Cuz in that case, Zab Judah's resume is SICK!

      Comment

      • Flawless
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 4856
        • 182
        • 208
        • 5,849

        #13
        Hope this doesn’t say ******. Resume Oscar De La Hoya. Achievements Roy Jones Junior.

        Comment

        • Silencers
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 21957
          • 505
          • 235
          • 32,983

          #14
          De La Hoya.

          Comment

          • The Wire
            West Ham til I die
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 1783
            • 158
            • 358
            • 8,739

            #15
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss
            he tryin to say this is oscars era and not RJJ?
            I just think these are two great fighters from the same era but Roy looks destined to go down as the better fighter despite the fact that Oscar took on all comers and inevitably lost some. Roy didn't really fight anyone and once he did he got KTFO.

            That makes it sound like I don't think Roy was as good as he looked - I do, I just wish (as a Roy fan) that he'd fought tougher opposition.

            Comment

            • BEHEMOTH
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 1668
              • 80
              • 35
              • 2,108

              #16
              Originally posted by The Wire
              How is it a loop hole question?

              Funny thing is, you're the guy that made me think of it saying the DLH is a fraud when you have Roy in your sig.
              I apologize to you then, darling.
              I thought you were an alt of Anorak.

              Comment

              • THE REED
                Sixty Forty
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 43489
                • 1,992
                • 1,483
                • 690,068,075

                #17
                Originally posted by The Wire
                I just think these are two great fighters from the same era but Roy looks destined to go down as the better fighter despite the fact that Oscar took on all comers and inevitably lost some. Roy didn't really fight anyone and once he did he got KTFO.

                That makes it sound like I don't think Roy was as good as he looked - I do, I just wish (as a Roy fan) that he'd fought tougher opposition.
                James Toney > Antonio Tarver...


                Completely looking past the fact he came down from HW, and the fact that he went 50 straight fights undefeated, from Middleweight to Heavyweight and back down to lightheavyweight, before getting knocked out at 35, would be outrageous.

                And the only Disqualification, immediately rematched and avenged by a first round KO... Roy literally made history with his resume


                Oscars opponent list is better than roys, but IMO roys achievments are better than oscars..

                Comment

                • The Wire
                  West Ham til I die
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 1783
                  • 158
                  • 358
                  • 8,739

                  #18
                  Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                  James Toney > Antonio Tarver...


                  Completely looking past the fact he came down from HW, and the fact that he went 50 straight fights undefeated, from Middleweight to Heavyweight and back down to lightheavyweight, before getting knocked out at 35, would be outrageous.

                  And the only Disqualification, immediately rematched and avenged by a first round KO... Roy literally made history with his resume


                  Oscars opponent list is better than roys, but IMO roys achievments are better than oscars..
                  So if that's the case then what about Calzaghe staying undefeated 11 years, defending his title 21 times, being undisputed champion at 168 and 175...?

                  But he (Calzaghe) didn't fight anyone and that's the problem I have with both fighters. Toney was severely weight drained. Roy's fault? No but it does tarnish the win. Hopkins chased a rematch for years once he became a better fighter and didn't get it, why? It would have been a huge fight but Roy didn't want it. IMO he's one of the most protected fighters in modern history.

                  Comment

                  • 2quick2slick
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 531
                    • 9
                    • 0
                    • 7,031

                    #19
                    Oscar. No brainer.

                    Comment

                    • Live Dog
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 3713
                      • 127
                      • 134
                      • 9,971

                      #20
                      more tougher.........................

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP