What makes Baldomir such a great fighter??
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
it's not revisionist...
baldomir had like 13 KO's on his resume and plenty of L's too.
the one thing baldomir's ever had physically is the fact that only a sledgehammer could knock him out. he's all heart and volume punching aside from that- thats always pretty clearly been the case if you ask me.
nobody gave him a chance to beat floyd- even after the upsets with zab and gatti.Comment
-
All those L's were at least 9 years old... KO's are worth as much as a decision win in truth.it's not revisionist...
baldomir had like 13 KO's on his resume and plenty of L's too.
the one thing baldomir's ever had physically is the fact that only a sledgehammer could knock him out. he's all heart and volume punching aside from that- thats always pretty clearly been the case if you ask me.
nobody gave him a chance to beat floyd- even after the upsets with zab and gatti.
And seriously, whose resume at 147 was better than Baldomir's at that point?
Spinks had moved up, Floyd already beat Judah, Margarito only had an unproven Cintron who had never won a championship, Cotto hadn't even fought at 147 at that point.
I just don't understand how people can say that Baldomir was undeserving.
The ONLY person who might have had a better argument was Margarito, because he had beaten so many good (not great) fighters in his long reign at 147 as the WBO champion.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment