I personally think Pavlik has accomplished more in less fights then Kessler has fought. What do you think?
Whos Accomplished more in boxing? Pavlik or Kessler?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Pavlik by a solid margin. Anybody who says differently is probably a Calzaghe nuthugger... seriously.Comment
-
pavlik, kessler lost to the man in his division, while kelly ktfo his! pavlik is the recognized mw champ! kessler was never that at smw. pavlik has faced better comp overall as well. he has the highest ko pct of any mw ever!Comment
-
Come on dude you cannot be serious. I'm not flaming but Kessler's biggest win is ****ing Mundine.Comment
-
Yeah, however that is FORMER champions. Pavlik beat the better quailty and more dangerous threats, he is also the undisputed middleweight king, where as Kessler only had two of the major belts. The best young fighter that Kessler beat was Anthony Mundine and thats not very impressive IMO. Pavlik beat Taylor( who was the pound for pound list) Miranda, Mkart, Zuniga( Who is IBO super middleweight champion) and many other good fighters. I would say Pavlik is more accomplished by a long shot.Comment
-
I am a Calzaghe nuthugger, but lets add it up. Kessler has held two SMW belts, defended a few times, beaten Mundine, Andrade and Beyer and given Joe Calzaghe his toughest fight. Then came back from his loss and won another title (albeit against average oppo)
Meanwhile Pavlik has one MW defence of his title and has beaten Taylor and Miranda.
I don't think its that clear either way, but as a Calzaghe nuthugger I favour Kessler.Comment
-
I would say Pavlik. In his two big fights he beat JT, and Kessler in his one big fight lost to Calzaghe. There is still a lot of time left in their careers so Kessler might be the more accomplished when it's all said and done.Comment
Comment