Why do people assume that Guzman is going to beat Campbell?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2501
    upinurgirlsguts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20211
    • 902
    • 49
    • 28,237

    #11
    because when considering all the factors in this match up, the smart money says guzman has the best chance to win?

    Comment

    • Boofdatruth
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 6304
      • 87
      • 0
      • 6,350

      #12
      I agree with Scott. He won't give Nate anything to hit. Nate can win because he is the bigger guy, and he has lthose long arms. Guzman will have to be careful in this fight.

      Comment

      • shadeyfizzle
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 7448
        • 160
        • 43
        • 13,959

        #13
        **** Guzman. I dont think he'll beat Campbell but i wouldnt mind him getting KO'd by Pac for the undisputed lightweight championship

        Comment

        • Tony Mangtana
          Contender
          • Jun 2008
          • 226
          • 5
          • 0
          • 6,651

          #14
          Because Nate Campbell's an idiot, lol

          Comment

          • Mr. Ryan
            Guest
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2004
            • 23429
            • 1,301
            • 1,089
            • 29,664

            #15
            Originally posted by raysan
            skills wise, Guzman is light years ahead of Cambell, and considering the controversy of Cambell beating Diaz (no drug testing), i have no doubt Guzman will outbox Cambell quite easily over 12 rounds. Id like to see Cambell bring and force a fight with Guzman, but if im betting, id have to take Guzman quite easily, who knows maybe im totally off.
            For all we know, the lack of a drug test could have benefited Juan Diaz, or Maskaev or Peter. Why does it have to be an issue for Nate Campbell?

            Most people who assume Campbell has no chance or enchanted by the undefeated record of Guzman. To my knowledge, Guzman has never beaten a top undefeated fighter. Campbell went to a very close decision loss to Casamayor who had only one defeat at the time, then knocked out undefeated Kid Diamond and beat undefeated Juan Diaz in his last fight.

            I'm not saying that Campbell should be an overwhelming favorite, but people need to stop sleeping on him because he's been beaten. That doesn't make him a bad fighter.

            Comment

            • ИATAS
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 36648
              • 2,509
              • 1,953
              • 50,835

              #16
              Originally posted by Silencers
              Styles make fights and Guzman's style will give Campbell a lot of problems but the big question about Guzman is how will he handle 135? His style depends a lot on speed, the extra weight could slow him down.
              shouldn't be a problem. Against Soto Guzman came in the ring weighing somewhere around the 147 mark (give or take a couple pounds). If anything it will help Guzman in the sense that it's 5 less pounds that he doesn't have to lose to make weight.

              Comment

              • majestiC
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2005
                • 2810
                • 126
                • 51
                • 3,400

                #17
                I don't rate Campbell at all but he did make me laugh thinking he was Mayorga that time!

                Comment

                • Mr. Ryan
                  Guest
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 23429
                  • 1,301
                  • 1,089
                  • 29,664

                  #18
                  Originally posted by majestiC
                  I don't rate Campbell at all but he did make me laugh thinking he was Mayorga that time!
                  Even though he has three of the titles at 135, you don't rate him?

                  Comment

                  • ElGranLuchador
                    A Friend To All
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 4793
                    • 141
                    • 103
                    • 5,434

                    #19
                    guzman is gonna win im giving 2 on1 odds if anyone wants to bet

                    Comment

                    • Silencers
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 21957
                      • 505
                      • 235
                      • 32,983

                      #20
                      Originally posted by natas206
                      shouldn't be a problem. Against Soto Guzman came in the ring weighing somewhere around the 147 mark (give or take a couple pounds). If anything it will help Guzman in the sense that it's 5 less pounds that he doesn't have to lose to make weight.
                      But he's not used to a naturally big 135 pounder like Campbell leaning on him in the clinches, roughing him up.

                      I agree though that he should be able to carry 135 pounds without much difficulty but it's still a question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP