I respectfully disagree and think it should be based on wins. The example you showed does show 100% KO's, in his wins. A boxer doesn't punch any less hard because he has more losses. It's when a fighter's wins are mostly by KO that you know he can really hit (or has been matched softly).
Maybe so. I just feel that if you can't KO 10 oppenents who all beat you, that should affect your ratio as it is someone you havn't KOd.
Of course, my opinion and i respect that others may disagree.
Willie Pep, not having the luxury of Robinson's spectacular offense, 1956 rounds.
I knew SRR's record didn't have the most rounds boxed. I knew it wouldn't be long before someone posted a fighter who fought more rounds. That is amazing though!!!
I heard about slapsy Maxie, haven't seen any footage on him, but he's in the HOF, right?
Yes he is. He had 221 wins with only 19 KO's. Doesn't take too much insight to figure out how he got the name "Slapsie Maxie". I'll now wait for the inevitable Joe Calzaghe jokes...
Tweet
Comment