New Feature on BOXREC...

[BrooklynBomber]

Seriously? No I didn't. Poor Lucy Liu is barely over 5'0 tall.

Yeah, well Wlad denied that, said that they were only friends.

[Jim Jeffries]

Vitali held his own. Wlad is a better boxer than his big brother.

[!! Mr. Soprano]

yooo Adrian!!!

:hurray: a face of a warrior - Bravo! :clap:

[Sin City]

Now I know why Margo wants the fight with mayweather so much, I bet this **** still haunts your type

Those bastards are taking back over!
white people run!!!! lol

[T-97]

Boxrec messed up the KO%. They divided the number KOs to the number of total fights instead of number wins.

Great post!!! :clap:


BTW, this thread had nothing to do with Wlad / Lennox like I said, it was just an observation...

and I think KO should be calculated by your wins and not your overall fights..

I think it should be you overall fights. Because;

The percentage is meant to represent what percentage of people w fighter has KOd. If a guy loses a fight, it means he hasn't KOd him.

EG-If someone was 13-27 13KO, I don't feel they should have a 100% KO ratio.

Of course, just my opinion.

[Sin City]

:hurray: a face of a warrior - Bravo! :clap:

did you make those emoticons or did you get them off of a website? they're pretty cool.

[Xyei]

I noticed this too. Just look at Sugar Ray Robbinson's record for an example. He boxed 1403 rounds....!!!!!!!

Sugar Ray Robbinson

[Jim Jeffries]

I noticed this too. Just look at Sugar Ray Robbinson's record for an example. He boxed 1403 rounds....!!!!!!!

Sugar Ray Robbinson

Willie Pep, not having the luxury of Robinson's spectacular offense, 1956 rounds.

[T-97]

Willie Pep, not having the luxury of Robinson's spectacular offense, 1956 rounds.

God Dayyyyum!!!

[Scott9945]

I think it should be you overall fights. Because;

The percentage is meant to represent what percentage of people w fighter has KOd. If a guy loses a fight, it means he hasn't KOd him.

EG-If someone was 13-27 13KO, I don't feel they should have a 100% KO ratio.

Of course, just my opinion.

I respectfully disagree and think it should be based on wins. The example you showed does show 100% KO's, in his wins. A boxer doesn't punch any less hard because he has more losses. It's when a fighter's wins are mostly by KO that you know he can really hit (or has been matched softly).