Nate Campbell: "After Guzman, It's Pacquiao or Funeka"

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

Contrary to several recent rumors, IBF/WBO/WBA Lightweight king Nate Campbell has no plans to vacate any of his world titles, especially the IBF belt. [details]

[MANGLER]

I wouldn't mind seein a Nate v Pac fight. Don't know **** about Funeka aside from him havin KO'd raheem.

[supermandathoe]

Campbell is a fighters fighter, he would fight 8 times a year if he could.

[Mojita]

After Edwin Valero, I see this fighting happening. I don't see Hatton beating Paulie. But If Hatton does beat Paulie and Paq wins againest Hatton then we could see this in late 09. Would be great.

[NeXt In Line]

Too bad he won't get past Guzman...

[OnePunch]

Too bad he won't get past Guzman...

care to put your money where your mouth is?

[PrettyBoyFloyd7]

Guzmman Gona Take Care Of Campbell I Got 2 K On Guzman Over Campbell Any Bets?

[Frozen Butter]

He Shouldn't take Guzman lightly but they all make that mistake and it costs them

[JAB5239]

care to put your money where your mouth is?

Terry, I know you got Nate and all, bujt how do you see a fight between him and Pac playing out after Manny's performance last week?

[OnePunch]

Terry, I know you got Nate and all, bujt how do you see a fight between him and Pac playing out after Manny's performance last week?

well, it's obviously impossible for me to be objective. Let me just say this:

When Nate has a level playing field, and has everything he needs as far as training camp, sparring, money, etc., (as he did in the Diaz fight), then NOBODY at 135 beats him. And that includes Pac. I would see Nate stopping Pac around 6 or 7, but maybe earlier if Pac elected to stay inside and trade with Nate.