Maikkel Kessler vs Antonio Tarver

[slicksouthpaw16]

Kessler would beat Tarver. AT is one of the most overrated fighters ever.

Who has Kessler beaten?

the BHOF is bull**** anyway dude it says as much about your credentials as a fighter as it does about your popularity thats why Gerald McClellan and Barry McGuigan are in their

Agreed, plenty of fighters are inducted that shouldn't be. I mean, of course i respect every boxer that steps inside the ring, but there are fighters that actually deserves to be in there that didn't.

[TommyGunn.]

Hill was LHW Champ for 4 years nowhere near

Calzaghe is a better fighter yes ,but no where near stop talking outta your arse son

I stick to my point....Hill was never on Calzaghe level. He was a B-level fighter.

[TommyGunn.]

Who has Kessler beaten?



Agreed, plenty of fighters are inducted that shouldn't be. I mean, of course i respect ever boxer that steps inside the ring, but there are fighters that actually deserves to be in there that didn't.

Records dont win fights. You can watch two fighters in seperate bouts and know by looking at them who would win.

Kessler > Tarver.

[slicksouthpaw16]

Records dont win fights. You can watch two fighters in seperate bouts and know by looking at them who would win.

Kessler > Tarver.

Thats not the way to judge fights at all. I watch the fighters carefully and see what styles give them problems. The quality of opposition also matters as well. For example, you can look at Calzaghe vs Lacy and Hopkins against Wright and you would have sworn that Calzaghe would have battered Hopkins, which certainly wasn't the case. I can tell that you were not a long time boxing fan becuase you would have known that styles makes fights.

[THE REED]

whose maikkel?

the new mortal kombat front runner?

[Guest]

Joe is a weird lefty and Kessler had problems with him.
Although different in style, Tarver is a weird lefty as well and I see Kessler having problems with him if Tarver's age hasn't caught up to him.

[Dynamite Kid]

Thats not the way to judge fights at all. I watch the fighters carefully and see what styles give them problems. The quality of opposition also matters as well. For example, you can look at Calzaghe vs Lacy and Hopkins against Wright and you would have sworn that Calzaghe would have battered Hopkins, which certainly wasn't the case. I can tell that you were not a long time boxing fan becuase you would have known that styles makes fights.

top post i could have looked at Douglas and said Tyson was gonna wipe the floor with him same goes for Forrest against Mosley

hell Dela Hoya looked the best fighter in the world against Mayorga and Y B Campas

[TommyGunn.]

Thats not the way to judge fights at all. I watch the fighters carefully and see what styles give them problems. The quality of opposition also matters as well. For example, you can look at Calzaghe vs Lacy and Hopkins against Wright and you would have sworn that Calzaghe would have battered Hopkins, which certainly wasn't the case. I can tell that you were not a long time boxing fan becuase you would have known that styles makes fights.

Why would you be able to judge Hopkins vs Calzaghe after watching Hopkins vs Winky? LOL!

The styles are completly different.

Before the Calzaghe vs Hopkins fight i stated the fight will be close through 6 rounds (it was) then Calzaghes work rate would take over second half (it did).

I could tell that by watching all both guys fights not by looking at both guys records.

[Dynamite Kid]

top post i could have looked at Douglas and said Tyson was gonna wipe the floor with him same goes for Forrest against Mosley

hell Dela Hoya looked the best fighter in the world against Mayorga and Y B Campas

Kessler himself looked like he was gonna beat Calzaghe if u watch his fight against Andrade

[TommyGunn.]

whose maikkel?

the new mortal kombat front runner?

Who is ree****yaluss? Is that ridiculous half brother.

Typo man. lol