If Pac fights Hatton, he is a fraud. Fight the undefeated ko artist Valero fraud!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flipside
    Lahing Mandirigma
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 3773
    • 446
    • 329
    • 24,198

    #91
    Originally posted by boofdatruth
    They call Guzman lil tyson because of hos he looks. Everyone knows he is a pure boxer. The good thing about a true champs, is that they expose those types of boxers that you think may not be able to handle the pressure is MIGHT be able to. we don't know. That is the rik of fighting a ko artist. Cotto did the same to Torres, but Torres showed he was the goods and won a title later. I don't want to see a so-called superfight with a man who was knocked out 2 fights ago. Hatton has to build his rep back.
    the call guzman lil tyson becasue he KOd mos of his opponents at 122 but wheh he stepped up he was more of a paulie's twin than a lil tyson

    Comment

    • deevel79
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 6831
      • 213
      • 27
      • 13,404

      #92
      Originally posted by deevel79
      Boof, wasnt u defending Floyd choice to rematch Oscar & Hatton over fighting Cotto, because supposebly Cotto didnt bring anything to the table?
      How is it that Floyd wasnt a fraud for wanting to rematch Oscar and Hatton, but now, U are calling Pac a fraud if he fights Hatton instead of Valero? U claim that Pac will be avoiding a undefeated ko artists if he doesnt fight Valero. Would've that be the same situation that Floyd was put in? He was avoiding Cotto to rematch Oscar and Hatton. I think people are REALLY overrating Valero right now.

      Comment

      • Boofdatruth
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 6304
        • 87
        • 0
        • 6,350

        #93
        Originally posted by deevel79
        boof, Wasnt U Defending Floyd Choice To Rematch Oscar & Hatton Over Fighting Cotto, Because Supposebly Cotto Didnt Bring Anything To The Table?
        No..........................

        Comment

        • Boofdatruth
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 6304
          • 87
          • 0
          • 6,350

          #94
          Originally posted by deevel79
          How is it that Floyd wasnt a fraud for wanting to rematch Oscar and Hatton, but now, U are calling Pac a fraud if he fights Hatton instead of Valero? U claim that Pac will be avoiding a undefeated ko artists if he doesnt fight Valero. Would've that be the same situation that Floyd was put in? He was avoiding Cotto to rematch Oscar and Hatton. I think people are REALLY overrating Valero right now.
          I've posted on this forum that I would remove floyd from my pfp top perch if he rematched either man.

          Comment

          • deevel79
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2005
            • 6831
            • 213
            • 27
            • 13,404

            #95
            Originally posted by boofdatruth
            I've posted on this forum that I would remove floyd from my pfp top perch if he rematched either man.
            My mistake then. I appoligize. I must've been thinking about Horus or Money May or one of those other coalition ****boys.

            Comment

            • Jim Jeffries
              rugged individualist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 20741
              • 1,376
              • 2,868
              • 54,838

              #96
              If Cotto fights Margarito, he is a fraud. Fight the undefeated KO artist Berto fraud!

              See how idiotic that sounds?

              Comment

              • PR Boxer
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 1154
                • 69
                • 47
                • 7,309

                #97
                Originally posted by boofdatruth
                Yes it does. It messes up the order of the true top 10 as well as disguises the mandatory defenses a fighter should fight. Had Cotto not been given a title shot, there would be a true top 10. How many times have we seen champions not face each other because of some bogus reason. Floyd and Cotto didn't even fight each other at 140. Now Floyd is ducking Cotto at 147??? Hogwash. Floyd had all of the titles, Manny has never unified a division. He came close I believe at superbantam or bantam.
                Umm... Floyd never had all the titles, he never unified the Welterweight division, there was a time he had the WBC and IBF Welterweight belts but he never unified the division. What you are talking about is that you have a double standard for Floyd, nothing more, nothing less. But the thing is Manny isn't Floyd and he isn't ducking anyone because he is fighting Valero on November 8.

                Comment

                • Boofdatruth
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 6304
                  • 87
                  • 0
                  • 6,350

                  #98
                  Originally posted by PR Boxer
                  Umm... Floyd never had all the titles, he never unified the Welterweight division, there was a time he had the WBC and IBF Welterweight belts but he never unified the division. What you are talking about is that you have a double standard for Floyd, nothing more, nothing less. But the thing is Manny isn't Floyd and he isn't ducking anyone because he is fighting Valero on November 8.
                  He didn't unify because the titles were stripped from baldomir for no reason. He is the undisputed champion. cotto or Margs should not be holding titles.

                  Comment

                  • Boofdatruth
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 6304
                    • 87
                    • 0
                    • 6,350

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
                    If Cotto fights Margarito, he is a fraud. Fight the undefeated KO artist Berto fraud!

                    See how idiotic that sounds?
                    berto just won his title lol. He wasn't chasing Cotto from JW like valero was at 130. It will be a shame if Pac fights sotto wouldn't it? That fight is being talked about now. Damn!

                    Comment

                    • fightingfigs
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • May 2008
                      • 4287
                      • 298
                      • 236
                      • 10,618

                      #100
                      Hatton is a tougher fight than Valero. Valero isnt that impressive

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP