Who performed better against Hopkins?

[deuce_drop]

Oscar took a body shot, & went down....after rounds of tedium between the two.

Explain how this is better than a man who kept coming, with KO power in his hands, until he was DRIVEN into the ground ?

Oscar didn't DO a damn thing against Hopkins. Nothing.
If you guys were impressed with that early stuff......damn.

i really don't give a ****, and i wasn't impressed. i said dlh looked better in getting his ass whooped. dlh was suckered into gainning confidence and then was ko'd.. tito was beat every round and looked confused,and embarassed, until he was stopped and daddy came to the rescue........so chata!!!

[MetalVomit]

Tito, at least he fight till the 12rd.

more like got beaten up till the 12th.

[Kimmy]

De La Hoya performed better than Tito. He at least was able to fight on even terms with Hop for 4 or 5 rounds. He won some rounds. Although his punches didn`t carry the power Tito`s did, at least he landed a few ( did Tito land any?? ).
If Oscar had been at middleweight for 2 or 3 years he may have been able to last the distance, even make things interesting on the scorecards. As for Tito, he was Hopkins ***** in that fight.
Robert Allen did better in his fight with Hop, Echols did better too!

[FrankJack]

I'd say that Tito had the better fight against Oscar.....one of the main reasons being that Tito wasn't dropped until the final round, and wasn't hurt until...what was it the 10th or 11th when he was stumbling right before the bell? Oscar had no chance of hurting Bernard, his punching power that night was.....eh, not anything to be concerned with. Besides that, when Bernard started feelin more comfortable in the fight Oscar started was starting to get roughed up. Tito took some ill shots from Bernard and kept tryin to bring it. Oscar took some good shots and started backin up instead of tryin to follow like he was doin at first.

[czars_salad]

oscar made a better fight

against trinidad, hopkins never trailed the whole fight. from round 1 to the last it was tito who played catch-up. tito, on his part, threw hard punches, but hopkins seemed ready for them. he was not stunned and he countered with heavier punches. and hopkins was more accurate against trinidad than he (hopkins) was against oscar.

like trinidad, dela hoya went toe-to-toe against hopkins. i even believe that prior to that round where he (oscar) was knocked out, he was ahead of points (against hopkins) and BH had a sense of urgency. hopkins was rather unprepared for dela hoya than he was against tito. it was dela hoya who controlled the fight.

but of course, hopkins emerged as the better fighter in the end.

[ottoevans]

oscar is the second fighter that has won more than 3 rounds against Hopkins since Hopkins lost his last fight.

I dont know if Hopkins let oscar win to give him confidence or not but Oscar did alright up until he got hit with the body shot.

The trinidad fight wasnt even a fight, it was a jail ****.

[DiegoFuego]

The only thing worthy of comparison is

Trinidad was KOed in the 12th round after an accumulation of punches

De La Hoya was beaten by a shot to the arm and he went down in tears

Trinidad remains the better fighter

[Neuraxis]

DLH won more rounds. Its not that difficult.

[DiegoFuego]

He lasted fewer

[+= El Jefe=+]

Oscar

I watched back to back last evening the battle between both Hopkins / Tito and Hopkins / DLH. Who do you guys think by comparing these two fights performed better against B. Hopkins? Oscar or Felix?

i really dont like Oscar
i doubted his heart untill i saw him
fight B-Hop
he really fought like a man
and well we all know how the Tito Fight went