Manny has been #1 2 years in my book.

[abadger]

Floyd competition compared to manny in the last 2 years.

.....

But...do you really think Pacquiao is the better boxer and beats Floyd P4P?

[Ray*]

So Judah lost to diaz at what weight?

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

Olympic trials dude...

You can't argue with me if you don't know that Diaz beat the balls off Judah.

next.

sooooo, amateurs count now??

[danny stash]

But...do you really think Pacquiao is the better boxer and beats Floyd P4P?

Not sure, this is kind of like apples to oranges but Manny lasy night seemed as fast as ever. I just think if 2 guys have never fought you have to look at the competition. Floyd looks great against sub par guys but even Judah was hitting him good.

[danny stash]

sooooo, amateurs count now??

Not really but it just illustrates my point of your ignorance to the sport thus taking a chunk out of your already thin credibility.

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

Not really but it just illustrates my point of your ignorance to the sport thus taking a chunk out of your already thin credibility.

I wanted YOU to answer the question. to say ""i'm counting amateurs". I asked you the question of "WHEN".

But now that you have admitted that it doesn't support any point you were making, you have clowned yourself. Again.

[danny stash]

I wanted YOU to answer the question. to say ""i'm counting amateurs". I asked you the question of "WHEN".

But now that you have admitted that it doesn't support any point you were making, you have clowned yourself. Again.

Your an idiot buddy. Here is a question when comparing 2 guys; is it easier to compare who the better fighter if they never fought or fought in the amateurs as opposed to NEVER. Diaz beat Judah in the AMS. He still beat him OK, so go on and tell me that Judah is a better fighter than Diaz and argue my point, you will lose soley on the fact that they fought once ansd Judah lost. My answer is YES it makes a difference if they fought in the Amateurs. As much as the Pro's no but it does make a world of difference.

[abadger]

Not sure, this is kind of like apples to oranges but Manny lasy night seemed as fast as ever. I just think if 2 guys have never fought you have to look at the competition. Floyd looks great against sub par guys but even Judah was hitting him good.

I see what you're saying, and really with the standard of opposition he made his name fighting, Pacqiao realy deserves the #1 spot. However, I do think Floyd would beat him, I've posted lots of times he can do everything Manny can do at the lower weights and can do a lot more defensively. It'd be a fantastic fight at 135/140 though.

[danny stash]

I see what you're saying, and really with the standard of opposition he made his name fighting, Pacqiao realy deserves the #1 spot. However, I do think Floyd would beat him, I've posted lots of times he can do everything Manny can do at the lower weights and can do a lot more defensively. It'd be a fantastic fight at 135/140 though.

Agreed. I am glad 2 people can have an intelligent discussion on here still. I think that fight would be tremendous.

If the fight happened 10 times I see results like this:
Floyd by decision 5 times
PAC by ko twice
Floyd by twice
Pac by decision once.

[abadger]

Agreed. I am glad 2 people can have an intelligent discussion on here still. I think that fight would be tremendous.

If the fight happened 10 times I see results like this:
Floyd by decision 5 times
PAC by ko twice
Floyd by twice
Pac by decision once.

I would favour Floyd nine times out of ten to be honest, even P4P and disregarding natural size. He's such a technician that I think he'd lock Pacman out strategically. Look at how effective Marquez could be simply using the counter right.

I would like pacman to beat him though, I mean, what an entertaining fighter!