Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Bernard Hopkins a smart fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by abadger View Post
    Sorry to say, it is you who knows **** all about...anything.
    Dude...you should really watch the fight. It's scary...

    Either you haven't watched the fight and are being an antagonist or...

    You DID watch the fight and have little comprehension of the sport.

    Just when you think you've heard it all...scoring missed or blocked punches; scoring activity; calling Hopkins' use of a jab, footwork and counter-punching an exercise in STRENGTH...wow.

    These forums never cease to amaze.

    Comment


    • #82
      Incredibly smart, he doesn't win through his own skills he wins off another fighter's weaknesses.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        Dude...you should really watch the fight. It's scary...

        Either you haven't watched the fight and are being an antagonist or...

        You DID watch the fight and have little comprehension of the sport.

        Just when you think you've heard it all...scoring missed or blocked punches; scoring activity; calling Hopkins' use of a jab, footwork and counter-punching an exercise in STRENGTH...wow.

        These forums never cease to amaze.
        i agree man. hard for him to see anything else when joe's sack in his face tho.

        Comment


        • #84
          since when does being a dirty cheat make you clever?

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
            Dude...you should really watch the fight. It's scary...

            Either you haven't watched the fight and are being an antagonist or...

            You DID watch the fight and have little comprehension of the sport.

            Just when you think you've heard it all...scoring missed or blocked punches; scoring activity; calling Hopkins' use of a jab, footwork and counter-punching an exercise in STRENGTH...wow.

            These forums never cease to amaze.
            In this case you are really being exceptionally dumb. What is so hard to understand about the concept of it being easy to box well when your size and strength place your opponent almost entirely under your control.

            You have completely ignored the actual content of my posts, like usual, in order that you have an argument you think you can win.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by abadger View Post
              In this case you are really being exceptionally dumb. What is so hard to understand about the concept of it being easy to box well when your size and strength place your opponent almost entirely under your control.

              You have completely ignored the actual content of my posts, like usual, in order that you have an argument you think you can win.
              I'm not on here to WIN an argument, my friend. I saw the fight. And I know what happened. But carry on...enjoy your delusional little world where Hopkins used his strength to beat up Tito. Some of us remember Tito being the aggressor, trying to FORCE A FIGHT while Hopkins boxed, gave him side to side movement, countered, stuck a stiff jab in his face and worked off the ropes like a pro. But yeah...I'm dumb.

              Idiot.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                I'm not on here to WIN an argument, my friend. I saw the fight. And I know what happened. But carry on...enjoy your delusional little world where Hopkins used his strength to beat up Tito. Some of us remember Tito being the aggressor, trying to FORCE A FIGHT while Hopkins boxed, gave him side to side movement, countered, stuck a stiff jab in his face and worked off the ropes like a pro. But yeah...I'm dumb.

                Idiot.
                I think you may have a valid point Why not make a poll?

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  I'm not on here to WIN an argument, my friend. I saw the fight. And I know what happened. But carry on...enjoy your delusional little world where Hopkins used his strength to beat up Tito. Some of us remember Tito being the aggressor, trying to FORCE A FIGHT while Hopkins boxed, gave him side to side movement, countered, stuck a stiff jab in his face and worked off the ropes like a pro. But yeah...I'm dumb.

                  Idiot.
                  See, you didn't even understand my posts. Where do i say that he "used his strength to beat up Tito" nowhere, thats where. Like I said, you're so keen to have a ******ed "Hopkins picked on smaller fighters" versus "Hopkins is a genius boxer" argument that you've ignored everything I said in order to try and have that argument.

                  Boring.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by ALT-Assassin View Post
                    I think you may have a valid point Why not make a poll?
                    I don't need a poll. Sometimes I feel like I'm dealing with the under 21 club, guys who began watching boxing in 2000 or guys who aren't fans of the sport but fans of one fighter.

                    I know what I saw. Besides, anyone else who watched the fight or can comprehend boxing (just look at this thread) knows the truth anyway. The fact that he continues in his ridiculously ****** argument is what makes it worse.

                    You know you lost when everyone you debate with keeps asking if you WATCHED the fight in question.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Yes, he's one of the smartest fighters in the game tonight and is arguably the smartest.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP