..Wondering, Slickster or Brawler?...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 521
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #11
    I mainly prefer slicksters for betting purposes as they have two ways to win where brawlers usually only have one. For just watching a fight i prefer to watch more combat as long as the **** isn't sloppy with holding and hugging, i would rather watch somone to wind sprints in the ring then greco-roman wrestling.

    So overall i guess i have to go with the slicksters, but its not that black and white for me.

    Comment

    • THe TRiNiTY
      Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 10079
      • 405
      • 103
      • 17,986

      #12
      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
      I mainly prefer slicksters for betting purposes as they have two ways to win where brawlers usually only have one. For just watching a fight i prefer to watch more combat as long as the **** isn't sloppy with holding and hugging, i would rather watch somone to wind sprints in the ring then greco-roman wrestling.

      So overall i guess i have to go with the slicksters, but its not that black and white for me.
      Of course not. It's very grey. I'm just talking the extremes for a 'harder choice', purpose.

      Comment

      • Pugilistic™
        MV3
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2006
        • 9848
        • 324
        • 305
        • 16,773

        #13
        i prefer slicksters.

        Comment

        • THe TRiNiTY
          Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 10079
          • 405
          • 103
          • 17,986

          #14
          Originally posted by Precision
          i prefer slicksters.
          The gif in your signature is a prime example of it, too.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP