I told you...hes ****ing weird...and dillusional.
I told you ....Calzaghe ACTUALLY thinks that beating Hops and Jones is for Legacy!!!
Collapse
-
-
To bad this F@G wouldnt fight them earlier in their careers. Damn, this fool is just a whack as a mac attack. What that means, I have no idea. Consider it a "FreeStyle" while I was typing.Comment
-
It is not necessarily just he that is delusional. It is also the British media who will hype up this as a win over a ring legend and make out like it makes Joe one of the best P4P of all time. They are nuts the media over there, it is ridiculous.
Comment
-
Calzaghe can do whatever he wants. Real fans, objective fans know that Calzaghe effectively retired after his bout with Kessler.Comment
-
Right...how can beating a 43 year old Hopkins and a 40 year old Jones mean ANYTHING???Comment
-
No doubt going to get flamed for it, but who gives a ****, but I think it is because they simply do not know the sport over there. They only know fighters - their own. The boxing experts just say - "Joe Calzaghe - well he's never lost. And he beat Hopkins, who is a legend. Therefore, Joe is the best in history." They will do the same thing if/when he beats a spent Roy. It will just be like, "Roy is a P4P great. Joe beat him - Joe is the greatest of all time." I was watching Setanta a couple of weeks ago and the "boxing expert" was hyping up Lockett's chances of beating Pavlik. I mean, FFS ppl.Comment
-
Comment
Comment