Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Every puncher gets drastically overrated until they meet a boxer.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Every puncher gets drastically overrated until they meet a boxer.

    Some examples...

    Jeff Lacy
    Edison Miranda
    David Haye (no offence)
    Kelly Pavlik
    Antonio Margarito


    It's all good when they're knocking out bums and other sluggers but when they meet boxers they all come unstuck and their bandwagon's wheels fall off. The sport is in love with punchers but you would have thought people would have realized this by now? Punchers are only good until they meet someone who can even out slug then or out box them and then they get "exposed" , it's easy enough to jump on a bandwagon, anyone can do it... but next time you do make sure it's for the right reasons.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Sir_Joe View Post
    Some examples...

    Jeff Lacy
    Edison Miranda
    David Haye (no offence)
    Kelly Pavlik
    Antonio Margarito


    It's all good when they're knocking out bums and other sluggers but when they meet boxers they all come unstuck and their bandwagon's wheels fall off. The sport is in love with punchers but you would have thought people would have realized this by now? Punchers are only good until they meet someone who can even out slug then or out box them and then they get "exposed" , it's easy enough to jump on a bandwagon, anyone can do it... but next time you do make sure it's for the right reasons.
    I agree you forgot to add hatton to this list.

    Comment


    • #3
      Calz probably could've "EXSPOSED" Pavlik on the same hand Pavlik could've gave Joe a brutal beat down! it was a 50-50 fight and those are the fights we wanna see homie.

      Comment


      • #4
        The problem with people with a lot of power is they sometimes abandon their boxing skills because they have that big eraser, the punch that corrects the mistakes they've been making.

        Sometimes they rely on the big shot way too much and eschew fundamentals.
        Looking for the knockout against a technician can definitely be a bad business plan.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
          The problem with people with a lot of power is they sometimes abandon their boxing skills because they have that big eraser, the punch that corrects the mistakes they've been making.

          Sometimes they rely on the big shot way too much and eschew fundamentals.
          Looking for the knockout against a technician can definitely be a bad business plan.
          I agree totally. Too many power punchers fall in love with their power and forget about boxing skills.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
            The problem with people with a lot of power is they sometimes abandon their boxing skills because they have that big eraser, the punch that corrects the mistakes they've been making.

            Sometimes they rely on the big shot way too much and eschew fundamentals.
            Looking for the knockout against a technician can definitely be a bad business plan.
            yep a bit like McClellan and Tyson who fell in love with thier power

            McClellan did'nt even bother blocking punches or defending himself he was just concerned about what he was dishing out

            Azumah Nelson used to walk u down literally with his hands glued to his head then just start unloading bombs

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Terrible... View Post
              yep a bit like McClellan and Tyson who fell in love with thier power

              McClellan did'nt even bother blocking punches or defending himself he was just concerned about what he was dishing out

              Azumah Nelson used to walk u down literally with his hands glued to his head then just start unloading bombs
              McClellan specifically sticks out as someone with bad defense but he had some kinda sting on his shots.
              Tyson's defense wasn't bad at all in his formative years but he forgot to move later on and took beatings because of it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                McClellan specifically sticks out as someone with bad defense but he had some kinda sting on his shots.
                Tyson's defense wasn't bad at all in his formative years but he forgot to move later on and took beatings because of it.
                yeah thats what i was referring to

                when Tyson fought Frank Bruno the first time he looked awfull

                Comment


                • #9
                  So is this point of this post basically to say that Calzaghe would "expose" Pavlik?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mt102879 View Post
                    So is this point of this post basically to say that Calzaghe would "expose" Pavlik?
                    I don't agree with it if that's the point. Pavlik can box and his defense has been fairly good. He gets hurt sure, but he has good fundamentals.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP