Tweet
you tell us to learn the ****ing sport but in reality the people who made the choice that pacquiao won wasn't a filipino. why are u mad and **** about it. u call us dumb but hey pac won. marquez is not even talking **** about it and u are still ****ing whining. look ***** he lost and it's not filipinos who made the decision it was the judges and there's nothing u can do about it. they are the ones who knows more about boxing than u. so stfu u *****. if u are ****ing heated about blame it to them not us. now u are ****ing pissed off again because it's not a mexican who is #1 p4p instead it's pacquiao again. hahaha. dude are u that obsessed with pacquiao and the pinoys. come on men.
-
-
He derserves it now that Floyd has goneComment
-
they will bring it up but it won't change anything. officially it'll still be a loss and treated us such. the difference is they'll take the loss with a grain of salt. remember people felt norton was robbed 2 against ali and that he was 3-0 vs. the goat but few people remember that. all they remember is ali beat norton 2-1.
jmm will still make the hof , i think he's done somewhat enough plus getting in the hall is not as hard as people think. you don't have to be ali or marciano to get in it.Comment
-
Your reffering to the Ring mag. That is one media that had Gorres winning over Montiel. You call those boxing media that scored it for Gorres as fake. So the RIng mag is fake and their score does not count. You also forgot to mentioned that the Ring mag said that the fight was close enough that could have gone either way and not a robbery. The other media also said this. Even the fans said this.This same Ring mag scored it for P. Williams against Margarito and Nate Campbell over Juan Diaz.
To you its a robbery cuz plain and simple, your a hater and biased.Last edited by loui_ludwig; 06-11-2008, 08:41 PM.Comment
-
Pac Man earned it..Comment
-
He referred to the Ring mag for a source. When i mentioned there were boxing medias who scored it for Gorres over Montiel, even with the 2 point deductions. He called them faked. Then he posted the score of the medias scores for JMM over Pac. A couple of those medias scored it also for Gorres, including the Ring mag. I guess those scores does not count cuz according to Xcaret, the Ring mag and others are faked.Comment
-
Apparently, some Mexicans think the only way PAC wins is if he knocks his Mexican opponent out..... Doesnt matter if PAC puts JMM on ***** street multiple times, because JMM survived the two fights therefore he must have won..... Sure, plain and basic common sense....
But wait, I thought you supported "Warriors"?????? JMM was such a ****ing Aztec warrior backing peddling, counter-punching, totally waiting and dependent on PAC's cowardly unbelievably predictable march forward..... What was I thinking????? PAC is such a ***** wanting to trade while JMM showed such aggression going backwards....Jeez, the courage JMM showed in not wanting to trade punches with PAC...... Christ, you Mexicans sure are tough mothers........Comment
-
Most boxing fans on this site are so fickle it's crazy. Manny moves to #1, now hes a one-dimensional fighter. Morales doesn't count, Barrera doesn't count. They were past their prime. He didn't really beat JMM.
The excuses go on. Ring mag's p4p list is just that--Ring mag's p4p list. A very effective nod at talented boxers that provides a career boost, bigger pay days, and a future bargaining chip for fans and experts in the timeless Top 10 p4p all time list.
As fans, we should aknowledge the list but not give it so much weight. We all enjoy different boxing styles and match-ups. We should be happy "Money" retired and the sport is finally swelling with real talent once again.Comment
Comment