This is a hard question as both have showed bravery, but it could be thought of as different kinds of bravery. Whilst Mayweather was barve enough to move up five different weight divisions, having to rely on his speed and defense more and more as he moved up Cotto has been hurt more times imo. When he has been hurt he has ridin through it to win the fight later on.
So in my opinion, i would not chose one over the other.
This is a hard question as both have showed bravery, but it could be thought of as different kinds of bravery. Whilst Mayweather was barve enough to move up five different weight divisions, having to rely on his speed and defense more and more as he moved up Cotto has been hurt more times imo. When he has been hurt he has ridin through it to win the fight later on.
So in my opinion, i would not chose one over the other.
This is a hard question as both have showed bravery, but it could be thought of as different kinds of bravery. Whilst Mayweather was barve enough to move up five different weight divisions, having to rely on his speed and defense more and more as he moved up Cotto has been hurt more times imo. When he has been hurt he has ridin through it to win the fight later on.
So in my opinion, i would not chose one over the other.
I'll have to agree on that, this one is kind of tough.
This is a hard question as both have showed bravery, but it could be thought of as different kinds of bravery. Whilst Mayweather was barve enough to move up five different weight divisions, having to rely on his speed and defense more and more as he moved up Cotto has been hurt more times imo. When he has been hurt he has ridin through it to win the fight later on.
So in my opinion, i would not chose one over the other.
Originally posted by RossCA
I'll have to agree on that, this one is kind of tough.
Here we have 2 Floyd supports being as objective and fair as possible.
Whereas the Cottomaniacs have just voted instinctively with their prejudice and bias.
I think it is easy to see that the Cottomaniacs are the more irrational and have the most to prove.
Here we have 2 Floyd supports being as objective and fair as possible.
Whereas the Cottomaniacs have just voted instinctively with their prejudice and bias.
I think it is easy to see that the Cottomaniacs are the more irrational and have the most to prove.
obviously not the truth. no amount of proof or evidence of the Floydian's delusional bias would make you realize or admit otherwise. this board has already spoken on who they believe is the most irrational "fan base" here.
the funny thing about it is that a poll was done to see who had the most fans here and floyd won, then a poll was done to see which fighter, in the board's opinion, had the most irrational fans and Floyd won by a landslide.
of course, this was countered by the typical, "all this proves is that floyd has more haters on this board" comment from the floydians regardless and negligent (perhaps purposely) of the fact that Floyd has more fans on this board than Cotto with the poll proving it.
Comment