Both are huge embarrassments. Since neither could hurt you, who would be the more embarrassing to get stopped by?
Who would you rather get KO'd by: Chris Byrd or Paulie Malignaggi
Collapse
-
Who would you rather get KO'd by: Chris Byrd or Paulie Malignaggi
14KO'd by Byrd57.14%8KO'd by Malignaggi42.86%6Tags: None -
beware, this is also a test to see who reads well.
prediction: we'll see 10 guys saying they meant to put the other option (as if it matters) -
I put Paulie, as it would be more embarrassing if he ko'd me.... But I'd rather be KO'd by Bird. Bird could probably do it in one clean shot. Paulie would have to sit there winding up on my chin and leave me bruised and bloodied until I fell.Comment
-
Comment
-
I'd rather be ko'd by byrd than paulie...
neither is a big puncher by any means but at least byrd has more knockouts under his belt...paulie only has 5KO's...byrd has double that...so it wouldnt be as embarrassing...
byrd is more likely to do it in one shot...
paulie would have to pull what mayweather did to hatton and land at an extremely high percentage to KO someone like 60-70% and if someone landed 60-70% on me i'd be embarrased with that alone...even if i didnt get knocked out...
so my pick is getting ko'd by paulie is more embarrassing.Comment
-
The trick is that your answer to the thread title question will be different to your answer to the poll question, but many people will not bother to read the question and will therefore vote in error.Comment
-
I put Paulie. Byrds lack of power was largely due to his fighting at 20lbs-30lbs his natural weight. Byrd could've fought his career at 168-175. Pac has great power but if he was fought his entire career at WW he would not be considered a puncher.
Paulie is fighting at (or much nearer) his natural weight and still lacks power.Comment
Comment