Never said Cotto didn't have enough to worry about. Margarito is a hella tuff defense. As witnessed by Mayweather never putting on the gloves to face him. Mayweather fought some really top fighters in the lower weight classes but he hasn't fought any real opposition in the last 3 years. Its time for him to step it up and fight while his name is still on the tip of peoples tongues. If Mayweather fought Gomez he would have made millions, yes we would have bitched about it but at least he would be active. We all see how well taking long lay off's worked for fighters in the past.
New York Times Mayweather article
Collapse
-
Well i think this is a great article anyway, Cotto gets a mention which would help because people would start searching and wanting to know more about the guy Mayweather isnt eager to get in a ring with while oscar is around.Comment
-
"Why fight Oscar again when Mayweather could prove he’s the best by fighting the best?"
Mayweather snorted in disgust and looked to Ellerbe, who stepped in close to me and said: “A fight has to make sense.
Our discussion of Cotto, who has already beaten Mosley, irritated Mayweather. Having abandoned his pose of smug feline ease, he remained sitting on the bed, reaching up to thump my chest with the back of his hand for emphasis as he refuted point by point the argument that he’s an overrated media darling who avoids guys who can beat him.
Bob Arum stated that everytime he brought up Margaritos name, Floyd would catch a hissy fit and start breaking things. It must've been true! LOL.
Comment
-
Bob Arum stated that Mayweather was the best fighter he has seen in 40 years... best since Ali. Is that true also?
Think for yourself, playboy.Comment
-
Floyd catches a hissy fit during the interview with the NY times writer when Cotto's name is mentioned. Given that, it gives credibility to what Bob said regarding Floyd catching hissy fits when he use to mention Margarito's name to him.Comment
-
Long read but it was worth it, thanks for the post.
I don't understand why people think he is so successful outside the boxing ring because he appears on lame WWE, appears on a reality show and hangs out with 50 cent.
His record label sucks (anyone remember that fight he had early/midway in his career when one of his rappers accompanied him to the ring rapping?). Aside from talking **** his only true skill is BoxingComment
-
Mayweather (aside from his normal job)Long read but it was worth it, thanks for the post.
I don't understand why people think he is so successful outside the boxing ring because he appears on lame WWE, appears on a reality show and hangs out with 50 cent.
His record label sucks (anyone remember that fight he had early/midway in his career when one of his rappers accompanied him to the ring rapping?). Aside from talking **** his only true skill is Boxing
1. Dancing with the Stars
2. WWE
3. Starting Indy 500
4. Promoting Beyonce and Chris Brown tours
Mattup (aside from his normal job)
1?
2?
3?
4?
I'm listening.....Comment
-
Anybody with Paulie in there avatar, sorry, can't take them seriously. ****ing clown...
And keep on posting that ****. It just fuels the greatness. I'm telling you, the **** was written by somebody that lost their wallet betting on Gatti. Or Judah.
It's funny. Mayweather makes the ****ing New York times. The dude writes some **** that is automatic MATH in some of your eye's.
The people that are MAD, are the folks that are in the Cotto vs Margarito threads, 24/7.
Who needs Ring, when you got the New York Times?
Comment
-
Who needs boxing greatness, when you can be like Paris Hilton?Anybody with Paulie in there avatar, sorry, can't take them seriously. ****ing clown...
And keep on posting that ****. It just fuels the greatness. I'm telling you, the **** was written by somebody that lost their wallet betting on Gatti. Or Judah.
It's funny. Mayweather makes the ****ing New York times. The dude writes some **** that is automatic MATH in some of your eye's.
The people that are MAD, are the folks that are in the Cotto vs Margarito threads, 24/7.
Who needs Ring, when you got the New York Times?
Comment
Comment