LOL @ Fat Yanks bitching about anthem booing

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Addition
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 8534
    • 306
    • 140
    • 20,828

    #51
    I can't believe everyone took Anorak seriously

    Comment

    • markosg
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2004
      • 168
      • 5
      • 0
      • 6,400

      #52
      'I can't believe that booed our anthem man!!!'

      No worries, you'll get us back by killing more of soldiers through freindly fire............. morons!

      Comment

      • squealpiggy
        Stritctly UG's friend
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 28896
        • 2,028
        • 1,603
        • 66,600

        #53
        Originally posted by Stickman
        And we probably won't, in the near future. I'm glad of that, but don't mistake that for meaning that I think Bush is doing everything right.

        I don't normally discuss politics on these forums, but I'll put my .02 in here, since you brought up Bush:

        This guy does do everything he can to ensure our country's safety, and has consistantly, unlike some past presidents. However, if you don't believe he's doing just as much as he can to increase his own family fortune, you're delusional. He is largely responsible for the "Global Warming" scare (check the record books, we've actually cooled off significantly in the last 10 years, biggest cool off in over 100 years) by buying into the ******* PC bull****. He's also, almost exclusively, directly responsible for our high fuel prices due to his continued refusal to get hardline on the matter with OPEC, Venez. and other suppliers. There IS NO FUEL SHORTAGE, never has been, and won't be for the foreseeable future. Have you ever had trouble actually buying gas? I'm not talking about being able to pay for it, I mean actually buying it. No, and you won't, because oil companies are only too happy to sell you all you can stand, at the current pricing, and would be happy to do so for all eternity while banking every penny you can afford to spend on it.
        Wow. Previously scientists didn't realise you could get more wrong in a single forum post. This could turn our understanding of the universe on its heard. Previously we thought that this much wrong in one place would create and event horizon which ****** all the words off the internet but the words are on the internet and there is a lot of wrong here.

        Comment

        • Stickman
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2005
          • 3318
          • 160
          • 63
          • 9,835

          #54
          Originally posted by squealpiggy
          Wow. Previously scientists didn't realise you could get more wrong in a single forum post. This could turn our understanding of the universe on its heard. Previously we thought that this much wrong in one place would create and event horizon which ****** all the words off the internet but the words are on the internet and there is a lot of wrong here.
          Everything I stated (regarding oil shortages and global warming) can be verified in dozens of places. Do some research for yourself instead of believing everything the global warming nutjobs try to ram down your throat.

          People who buy into all that bull**** (like you?) do more to **** up the planet than a dozen factories burning raw oil and dumping Co2 as fast as they can.

          Comment

          • squealpiggy
            Stritctly UG's friend
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 28896
            • 2,028
            • 1,603
            • 66,600

            #55
            Originally posted by Stickman
            Everything I stated (regarding oil shortages and global warming) can be verified in dozens of places. Do some research for yourself instead of believing everything the global warming nutjobs try to ram down your throat.
            Au contraire, the nutjobs are not the "global warming" crew. It's the people who are denying that there is any climate change at all occurring who are the nutjobs. Mainstream climate science fully accepts that the climate is changing, that the global trend is a net temperature increase, that this change is going to have major effects on local weather and conditions and that human beings, in particular human industry, is responsible for the major part of the change. The debate in climatology circles is about the best course of action to counter the change (and no, Kyoto is not the way to go...), not about whether it has happened. These assertions have been established via hundreds of scientific reports submitted to peer reviewed journals. And no, Rush Limbaugh phone-in does not qualify as "peer review".

            People who buy into all that bull**** (like you?) do more to **** up the planet than a dozen factories burning raw oil and dumping Co2 as fast as they can.
            Are you intending to back up this brainless declaration with some sort of reasoning or do you intend to leave us hanging like your lower jaw?

            Comment

            • Stickman
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2005
              • 3318
              • 160
              • 63
              • 9,835

              #56
              Look, do the research yourself. The global temperature peaked 10 years ago, that is fact, and can be referenced ANYWHERE on the internet, and we've experienced nearly a full degree of cooling (the most dramatic in over 100 years) since then. I am NOT going to debate this ad-nauseum with a fanatic who wouldn't disbelieve the global warming hype if he were sitting in a foot of snow in a Florida July. Your "people" are now claiming that global cooling is masking the global warming. How ****ing nuts is that? Sure, Co2 is high, but there is also no direct correlation between mean temperature and Co2 levels, contrary to popular theory.

              Anyway, like I said, dig the info up yourself, it's readily available. Here's one link to get you started:



              And if you're incapable of discussion without insults, then don't bother replying to me at all. The next smartass remark directed at me gets you ignored. I have no need or desire to waste my time with a moron who has to result to direct insults in an attempt to make himself feel smarter, or to get his point across. If that's you, then this will be g'bye.
              Last edited by Stickman; 05-30-2008, 11:54 PM.

              Comment

              • Motofan
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 9098
                • 604
                • 1,916
                • 28,443

                #57
                Originally posted by !! Anorak
                Three points:


                1. In NO WAY do I condone the booing of a country's anthem. I find it a classless act and it makes me feel ashamed if the people doing it are from my own country. However.........

                2. Clinton Woods sure got some God Save The Queen boos, didn't he?

                3. What's so funny about it is that 90% of Yank posters on here (okay, I exaggerate... 99%) are the most xenophobic, hostile little ****s you've ever met. Every other thread is "yo, eye dont like no freakin' euro's, do u guy's fink dat bush cud bomb 'em like he did two eye rack?" And then those same little ****ers that say "yo,, if a fite didnt take plaice in da state's it must be a freakin' roberry, lamo!" have their *****.

                I've read **** on here like "terrible country" about another nation - nothing to do with boxing, note - but then those same guys hear a boo and it's

                Suck my ****.

                Comment

                • Poet682006
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 17924
                  • 1,181
                  • 1,350
                  • 26,849

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Stickman
                  Look, do the research yourself. The global temperature peaked 10 years ago, that is fact, and can be referenced ANYWHERE on the internet, and we've experienced nearly a full degree of cooling (the most dramatic in over 100 years) since then. I am NOT going to debate this ad-nauseum with a fanatic who wouldn't disbelieve the global warming hype if he were sitting in a foot of snow in a Florida July. Your "people" are now claiming that global cooling is masking the global warming. How ****ing nuts is that? Sure, Co2 is high, but there is also no direct correlation between mean temperature and Co2 levels, contrary to popular theory.

                  Anyway, like I said, dig the info up yourself, it's readily available. Here's one link to get you started:



                  And if you're incapable of discussion without insults, then don't bother replying to me at all. The next smartass remark directed at me gets you ignored. I have no need or desire to waste my time with a moron who has to result to direct insults in an attempt to make himself feel smarter, or to get his point across. If that's you, then this will be g'bye.
                  Umm. I don't know if this has occured to anyone but Co2 is Carbon Dioxide. We EXHALE carbon dioxide when we breath. Plants INHALE carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen. In order to get rid of carbon dioxide EVERYONE WOULD HAVE TO STOP BREATHING; and at THAT point all the plants would die because they would have nothing to breath in.

                  Poet

                  Comment

                  • majestiC
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2005
                    • 2810
                    • 126
                    • 51
                    • 3,400

                    #59
                    Originally posted by squealpiggy
                    Au contraire, the nutjobs are not the "global warming" crew. It's the people who are denying that there is any climate change at all occurring who are the nutjobs. Mainstream climate science fully accepts that the climate is changing, that the global trend is a net temperature increase, that this change is going to have major effects on local weather and conditions and that human beings, in particular human industry, is responsible for the major part of the change. The debate in climatology circles is about the best course of action to counter the change (and no, Kyoto is not the way to go...), not about whether it has happened. These assertions have been established via hundreds of scientific reports submitted to peer reviewed journals. And no, Rush Limbaugh phone-in does not qualify as "peer review".



                    Are you intending to back up this brainless declaration with some sort of reasoning or do you intend to leave us hanging like your lower jaw?
                    Sorry Squel but a recent report says there will be no more warming for the next 15 years and to expect global cooling, global warming recently changed its name to Climate Change. It's a scam, it gives the excuse to over tax us. China had the coldest winter on record so did Argentina in the past year, America had one of the worst winters it's ever had. We are no where near pumping as much CO2 as there was in the past, they would have you believe the contary. We haven't had a warmer year since 1998, yes on average over the years it's slightly gone up but it starting to go down once more. It's a natural cycle, what annoys me most it takes the world's eye of more important issues like deforestation, I mean bio-fuel is the biggest disaster waiting to happen.

                    Comment

                    • Jambo boy
                      Iambic Pentameter
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 6191
                      • 645
                      • 724
                      • 17,959

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Stickman
                      Look, do the research yourself. The global temperature peaked 10 years ago, that is fact, and can be referenced ANYWHERE on the internet, and we've experienced nearly a full degree of cooling (the most dramatic in over 100 years) since then. I am NOT going to debate this ad-nauseum with a fanatic who wouldn't disbelieve the global warming hype if he were sitting in a foot of snow in a Florida July. Your "people" are now claiming that global cooling is masking the global warming. How ****ing nuts is that? Sure, Co2 is high, but there is also no direct correlation between mean temperature and Co2 levels, contrary to popular theory.

                      Anyway, like I said, dig the info up yourself, it's readily available. Here's one link to get you started:



                      And if you're incapable of discussion without insults, then don't bother replying to me at all. The next smartass remark directed at me gets you ignored. I have no need or desire to waste my time with a moron who has to result to direct insults in an attempt to make himself feel smarter, or to get his point across. If that's you, then this will be g'bye.
                      You're obviously a fat yank so you wouldn't know, but we've had some ****ed up weather here in the UK lately. It may not be due to global warming but those ****in polar icecaps are melting like ****. I don't know what they teach in your yank schools apart from how to be a fundementalist christian and how to eat, but here we were taught that when ice gets hot it melts.

                      PM me for more science lessons ****head.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP