Cotto should have had a loss.

**muppetman** · 05-28-2008, 06:50 AM

Originally posted by makaveli_uk

What a ****in stoppage.

i dont see your point.........cotto scared Corley into quitting ........thats corleys fault but then again that was a ****ty stoppage but it look like cotto was to much for corley it was only a matter of time till cotto started to make corleys face look even uglier.....so no cotto would have still one in my veiw.

**Sealhound** · 05-28-2008, 06:52 AM

Cotto was going to **** him up. But yer too early for the stoppage. Corley looked like he didn't want to be there though by the end.

**makaveli_uk** · 05-28-2008, 06:53 AM

Cotto got caught but recovered well I guess.. Still think it could have been a loss.

**Silencers** · 05-28-2008, 06:55 AM

Cotto was badly hurt but recovered and the stoppage was premature.

**Sealhound** · 05-28-2008, 06:57 AM

Originally posted by makaveli_uk

Cotto got caught but recovered well I guess.. Still think it could have been a loss.

A loss how? That's ridiculous.

**Shalafi** · 05-28-2008, 07:01 AM

Cotto was hit right on the temple, anyone would of wobbled the way he did, that **** hurts like a mother ****er. I still think the Torres fight was the closest fight Miguel Cotto ever came from losing his 0.

**ATFsven** · 05-28-2008, 07:10 AM

gay stoppage!
Corley couldnt continue as he got a low blow! didnt get the time to recover and was still in distress.
i would have taken the ref out with a left hook to his balls! see how he likes it

**KING �** · 05-28-2008, 08:42 AM

**deevel79** · 05-28-2008, 08:44 AM

Premature stoppage, i agree, but as one poster here put it "Corley was taking knees as if he was in front of the Queen of England" LOL.

Cotto should have had a loss.