Who is a better HW than Muhammad Ali?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • T-97
    BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 14808
    • 566
    • 628
    • 22,958

    #21
    Originally posted by WLAD OWNS
    I never said they WOULD, I said they're CAPABLE....the modern day big, skilled and powerful heavyweights like Wlad, Lewis and Vitali would give Ali a ****load of trouble and have a good chance of beating Ali.
    Then i apologize. I thought you were saying that they would beat Ali without a doubt.

    Comment

    • KESSLER
      GOONER FOR LIFE
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 15487
      • 782
      • 716
      • 24,000

      #22
      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
      When was his prime? Ali was 29 when Frazier beat him, 31 when Norton beat him, 21 when Cooper almost knocked him out. Ali was great, but anyone is beatable.

      He did get robbed from his prime years when they took his liscense.
      But there is guys who is capable of beating him. Such as Lewis

      Comment

      • deanrw
        Mayor Ford's dealer...
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 13096
        • 1,047
        • 1,007
        • 1,860,285

        #23
        Originally posted by WLAD OWNS
        I never said they WOULD, I said they're CAPABLE....the modern day big, skilled and powerful heavyweights like Wlad, Lewis and Vitali would give Ali a ****load of trouble and have a good chance of beating Ali.
        I'm going to post the same response to you that I made in another thread as I find it fitting:

        "Many this day seem to think that today's athletes are better due to conditioning etc. In some aspects that is true and it can make a particular fighter better than without that conditioning.

        What they fail to realize, is that boxing's gene pool is much smaller now than it used to be. Right up into the 80's, Boxing was still a huge sport and the amount of people entering the game was multiple times larger than it is now.

        To young athletes, boxing is no longer a first choice for them to get into. You have less people entering the sport, thus the potential for finding special fighters is dramatically reduced.

        When Ali was in his prime, he was the top dog over other heavyweights who themselves, would make today's crop of heavyweights look rather amateurish."
        Last edited by deanrw; 05-11-2008, 03:02 PM.

        Comment

        • WLAD OWNS
          World Heavyweight Champ
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 5628
          • 375
          • 69
          • 12,477

          #24
          Originally posted by deanrw
          I'm going to post the same response to you that I made in another thread as I find it fitting:

          "Many this day seem to thing that today's athletes are better due to conditioning etc. In some aspects that is true and it can make a particular fighter better than without that conditioning.

          What they fail to realize, is that boxing's gene pool is much smaller now than it used to be. Right up into the 80's, Boxing was still a huge sport and the amount of people entering the game was multiple times larger than it is now.

          To young athletes, boxing is no longer a first choice for them to get into. You have less people entering the sport, thus the potential for finding special fighters is dramatically reduced.

          When Ali was in his prime, he was the top dog over other heavyweights who themselves, would make today's crop of heavyweights look rather amateurish."
          You're entitled to your own OPINION.

          Comment

          • micky_knox
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 718
            • 18
            • 10
            • 7,024

            #25
            Nobody was better than Ali


            The end.

            Comment

            • T-97
              BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 14808
              • 566
              • 628
              • 22,958

              #26
              Originally posted by WLAD OWNS
              You're entitled to your own OPINION.
              Thats true.

              However, i have to say. Your opinion does seem rather biased at times. Not that i care tbh, i like Wlad.

              Comment

              • Scott9945
                Gonna be more su****ious
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 22032
                • 741
                • 1,371
                • 30,075

                #27
                Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
                When was his prime? Ali was 29 when Frazier beat him, 31 when Norton beat him, 21 when Cooper almost knocked him out. Ali was great, but anyone is beatable.
                I believe that Ali's prime was the period he was forced into being inactive. Normally 29 would have been his prime, but he was still trying to shake off the rust from an almost four year layoff. So IMO, the closest thing to his true prime was in 1967.

                Comment

                • Sin City
                  la mala vida
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 27551
                  • 1,757
                  • 2,208
                  • 47,596

                  #28
                  Joe Louis..

                  Comment

                  • TheGreatA
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 14143
                    • 633
                    • 271
                    • 21,863

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
                    When was his prime? Ali was 29 when Frazier beat him, 31 when Norton beat him, 21 when Cooper almost knocked him out. Ali was great, but anyone is beatable.
                    I'd say in 1966 and 1967.
                    You can't discredit Frazier's or Norton's wins because Ali was certainly a hell of a fighter when they fought him but I'd say Ali was at his best before the long layoff.


                    No one can say this Ali was badly diminished. Frazier was simply ready to walk through anything to get to Ali.
                    Great fight and Ali's other two wins over Frazier shouldn't be discredited either.


                    Here's Ali against the 6'6 WBA champion Ernie Terrell who was a pretty good fighter IMO.


                    Joe Frazier
                    Last edited by TheGreatA; 05-11-2008, 03:14 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Jim Jeffries
                      rugged individualist
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 20740
                      • 1,376
                      • 2,868
                      • 54,838

                      #30
                      Originally posted by SinatraFan
                      That video has Gus Ruhlin and Tom Sharkey fights with Jeffries, which took place between 1897-99. The existing footage was too grainy for you to even recognize who was who, let along make an assessment as to Jeffries being a superior fighter to anyone.
                      Jeffries had 8 wins against HOFers and was undefeated till he came back to fight Jack Johson, 6 years without so much as a tuneup fight, and he still went 15 rounds. Johnson himself said Jeffries was the greatest HW champ ever.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP