If junior witter loses tonight...
Collapse
-
I don't understand why people yell about ducking. It is a simple fact that when you reach a certain point, you take fights based on a monetary risk/reward analysis. You take the fights that pay high and have low risk. It would be ****** not to. A Junior Witter fight would have moderately high risk and moderately low pay. Now, a Malinaggi fight will have moderate risk (of losing the fight, and absolutely no risk of being beat up) with good pay. The risk is magnified by the fact that he has an outside but realistic shot at De La Hoya's December date. That fight, while still having moderately high risk, would have absurdly high pay.Comment
-
What is realy sad about these Witter fanboys is tonight will be the first time many of them have seen him fight.
I'll let you into a little secret guys. He's not on Hattons level, never has been never will be.Comment
-
...more protected...padded record...fights out of prime fighters...loses when steps it up
this thread seems pathetic to you because your a hatton fanboy and you know it wont matter win lose or draw, hatton ducked witter for 7 years and the only thing that can change that fact is until they fight.
witter is taking risks fighting young and up comers while hatton is fighting the likes of urango, maussa and some out of prime fighters, why not fight a prime fighter like junior witter who is the #1 contender at 140 to hatton? can you define juan lazcano? wait dont answer that...a guy who made his name at 130-135, who is finished and hasnt fought for nearly 16 months. if he fights this prime version of witter his legacy at 140 is set. fighting out of prime fighters with having your cousin dave parris doesnt countThe reason why Hatton wont fight Witter is this...Witter is still fighting the young up and comers, still making a name for himself. Hatton is fighting the champions, the money fights, the P4P best fighters in the world, the legacy fights. If the roles were reversed, Witter wouldnt fight Hatton.
young up and comers like? go on...Hatton had his period of fighting and defeating the young up and comers, its ignorant to claim that he hasnt. Hell, Urango was a young up and comer when Hatton fought him, also undefeated...but he was a champion. Collazo was a young up and comer...in a higher division...also a champion. So dont slant your bull**** around Hatton in this way.
urango had two gift decisions against Arnaoutis and ben rabah. everyone thought hatton would knock the **** out of him but what happened was he hurt hatton to the body while hatton couldnt hurt him so chose to box. but it was expected that u wouldnt know that since u only follow hatton. collazo was a young up and comer? lmfao i take it that u havent seen collazo pre hatton either
How was Witter a prick? by calling hatton out and saying he wants to fight him? then Hatton must be a prick too since he done that against mayweather. the double standards of hatton fans are as worse as their lame excuses defending him on why he shouldnt fight witter. hatton even talked **** about floyd in the castillo fight knowing castillo was out of his prime. who is the prick now? truth hurts doesnt it? dont make the money excuse is juan lazcano a more money lucrative fight than witter? was urango or maussa more lucrative? see why i say the excuses are really lame?If Witter hadnt been such a prick towards Hatton throughout his career (and now that Hatton actually lost a fight all of these supposed 'Witter fans', who had never heard of the ****er before then come out of the woodwork talking about how Hatton has been ducking Witter all his life), if he'd made a proper name for himself, if he'd actually represent the most money out there available for Hatton (which he doesnt, dont kid yourself), then Hatton would have no option but to fight him.
your one funny guy mik, keep defending your boy while more people can enjoy readin the lame excuses with loud laughter. 50/50 with floyd after getting knocked the **** out? before he got knocked out wasnt it 60/40 in favour of floyd? hattonboys cant face reality when they know defending hatton beyond this is pathetic.Hell, in actuality he's on his way to doing that. Win a few more defenses of his title, see if Hatton can get the ODH fight or Floyd rematch (50/50 for each happening I'd say) and if not I can see them fighting a couple bouts down the line, but until then shut the **** up.
All Witter's nobodys are great, all Hatton's somebodies are washed up bums or inexperienced, huh?
u have it the other way around witter somebodies are prime fighters and young and up comers. hattons nobodies are bums mostly of fighters with padded record or gift decisions like urango had against arnautis n ben rabah, hatton carefully picks them, witter doesnt give a **** and risks it. hatton fights them all washed up, he will probably fight witter in 2 or 3 years when he is past his peak/prime.Comment
-
How do you know? have you seen fight yet? no because he has been busy ducking for 7 years and padding his record...hatton after the collazo fight knows that he should probably stay away from witter he doesnt believe in himself after knowing that slick fighters just arent for himComment
-
If Witter loses tonight, I don't want to hear another damn word about Hatton ducking that nobody.Comment
-
Yes, but if you want to call yourself the best in the division then you have to prove it. Hatton did this in the past but he has to do it once more when high quality challengers come along, particularly if the guy is acknowledged by most people as being his toughest potential opponent.I don't understand why people yell about ducking. It is a simple fact that when you reach a certain point, you take fights based on a monetary risk/reward analysis. You take the fights that pay high and have low risk. It would be ****** not to. A Junior Witter fight would have moderately high risk and moderately low pay. Now, a Malinaggi fight will have moderate risk (of losing the fight, and absolutely no risk of being beat up) with good pay. The risk is magnified by the fact that he has an outside but realistic shot at De La Hoya's December date. That fight, while still having moderately high risk, would have absurdly high pay.
This is why I have no real problem with what Chavez Jr is doing. There is little risk from the low quality opponents, and a decent (not high I suppose) reward because of trading off of his father's name and success. But it's different because Chavez Jr doesn't have a belt, he doesn't act as if he is the best, neither do his fans and he isn't rated as the best by any organisation or The Ring.
Hatton though is supposed to be the best, and like Mayweather or anyone else that means that he has a position to defend. Sometimes you have to choose legacy over money.Comment
-
Comment
-
it doesnt change anything until hatton and witter actually fight. if cotto loses to margarito i will still stay mayweather has to fight both of them, or mayweather didnt duck cotto. denial is denial and the fatton fanboys are the first step to denial with their **** ****** love for hatton. pathetic excuses about money and everything, when all of it is answered in this threadComment
-
Have already seen the Hatton fanboys praying for Witter to lose tonight, And even if he did it would change the fact that Hatton was too scared to get in the ring with him....NO excuse...Hatton wasnt fighting Champion in every of his fights he was padding his record with bums.Comment
Comment