It is hard for even the most ardent detractor of Floyd, to say his work at 130 was nothing short of brilliant. It was really amazing, he beat and destroyed fighters witha a combination of speed,power and defensive genius.
His fights with castillo , in my opinion, changed his approach. He was more cautious and less eager to exchange with guys in the ways he did in 130. Of course, when matched with a way lesser opponnent, the Floyd of old reappears.
What I don't care for , is the Greatest of all time talk. No boxing fan , that has followed the sport can take that seriously. Floyd resume post 135 is not warranted of mention of Greatest of all time.
We all have favorites and sometimes it is hard to hear negativity thrown at your fighter. I aways roll wit Oscar, but i know his limitations and am not a defender of his to the grave. I could make the claim that Oscar is the greatest of all time cause he has won belts in 6 divisons and beat better opponents than Floyd, but that would be foolish and disrespectful to all those who are indeed worthy of being called the greatest of all time.
His fights with castillo , in my opinion, changed his approach. He was more cautious and less eager to exchange with guys in the ways he did in 130. Of course, when matched with a way lesser opponnent, the Floyd of old reappears.
What I don't care for , is the Greatest of all time talk. No boxing fan , that has followed the sport can take that seriously. Floyd resume post 135 is not warranted of mention of Greatest of all time.
We all have favorites and sometimes it is hard to hear negativity thrown at your fighter. I aways roll wit Oscar, but i know his limitations and am not a defender of his to the grave. I could make the claim that Oscar is the greatest of all time cause he has won belts in 6 divisons and beat better opponents than Floyd, but that would be foolish and disrespectful to all those who are indeed worthy of being called the greatest of all time.
Comment