Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pavlik is the only good opponent for Calzaghe

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by deanrw View Post
    Well first off. Kessler is a stand up boxer. That is his strategy and he will do it for the whole fight. Pavlik uses the jab and right hand to open guys up, so he can get inside and rip the living hell out of them. Pavlik has a killer mentality. kessler has a cautious one.
    Pavlik didn't work on the inside much in either Taylor bout, and really kept Miranda at range for the most part. I have only seen Pavlik's killer instinct against Miranda, and against Taylor in the first fight, but only when he had him hurt. Otherwise, he boxed on the outside with great effectiveness. Calzaghe would tear that **** in half.

    Kessler looked far from cautious against Librado Andrade, like Pavlik did against Miranda. I think both of those fights are going to be considered oddball fights in their careers when all is said and done.

    Originally posted by ~Lucky13~ View Post
    he's just ignoring pavlik's arsenal, saying all he does is 1-2 is straight up ignorant and he should feel ashamed for saying such an absurdity
    Yeah... you are right, he throws his world class left hook with great frequency.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by deanrw View Post
      Pavlik had to fight Taylor a certain way to negate his speed. To throw hooks and uppercuts at a distance would have left him wide open to Taylor.

      For a guy who does not know how to throw them, he certainly does a good job of knocking guys unconscious with them!lOL
      yep, you're absolutely right
      pavlik has ring smarts but ignorant people like dweins fail to acknowledge that

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by deanrw View Post
        Pavlik had to fight Taylor a certain way to negate his speed. To throw hooks and uppercuts at a distance would have left him wide open to Taylor.

        For a guy who does not know how to throw them, he certainly does a good job of knocking guys unconscious with them!lOL
        The hook and uppercut are shots that you can put great power on if you load up a lot. It is easy to load up a lot and get away with it when your opponent is hurt. He hasn't really shown a good, short, compact left hook when his opponent isn't out on his feet IMO.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
          The hook and uppercut are shots that you can put great power on if you load up a lot. It is easy to load up a lot and get away with it when your opponent is hurt. He hasn't really shown a good, short, compact left hook when his opponent isn't out on his feet IMO.
          that's just not pavlik's style, and he isn't exactly what you call an inside fighter, he's a boxer/puncher with incredible power

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by RodBarker View Post
            True its only 3 years between them but Roy has a lot more mileage taken out of him by being stopped twice and by traversing weight classes drastically , Roy is just worn down way more than Cal is and is a shadow of his former self , I dont like seeing Roy as a win on a resume these days as its a false notch to have but that dont seem to bother JC , a name is a name right !
            The thing is that it's really the only guy he would still get any credit for beating. Pavlik and Dawson are too green and while Calzaghe would have more trouble with Dawson he would still probably beat them both (Pavlik would be a semi-easy fight for Calzaghe). The only problem is if he did fight these two instead of Jones and beats them, everyone will say "Jones was a legend and still better than those two guys. They were just two inexperienced for that fight. Jones would of beaten him easily with his speed."

            Why fight two guys that are unknown for half the money and a big 0 in terms of name when he could fight the greatest fighter of his era who has a wee bit of momentum going into this and who most people give more of a chance than just about anyone else? He would get a **** load of dough for it and way more respect by beating first Hopkins, who had just beaten Tarver and Wright and then Jones, who of course needs no intro having looked better against Tito than he had in years, not that that would have been overly difficult mind you.

            Anyone else is a completely pointless and thankless fight with no respect. Jones is the only fight out there at the moment.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by ~Lucky13~ View Post
              yep, you're absolutely right
              pavlik has ring smarts but ignorant people like dweins fail to acknowledge that
              Hey genius, I have said many times that being one-dimensional does not necessarily disqualify you from being a good, or even great fighter. Pacquiao used to be pretty one-dimensional, but still was a great fighter. He is even better now that he knows how to box more effectively from the outside if he needs to.

              I just think that the day that someone takes the jab away from Pavlik, he is a dead man in the ring. He won't be able to pile up points on his jab, and he won't be able to set up his right.

              Calzaghe would crush this kid, badly. I also think Pavlik, being a middleweight, is too small to hurt Calzaghe, who has been struggling to make 168 recently. Calzaghe is too big, too experienced, and overall, just too good for Kelly Pavlik.

              Comment


              • #87
                Ali never had much of a left hook either, does that mean is was one-dimensional?
                Ali never even had a body attack, Pavlik on the other hand has an outstanding one

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by ~Lucky13~ View Post
                  that's just not pavlik's style, and he isn't exactly what you call an inside fighter, he's a boxer/puncher with incredible power
                  WELL ****ING A! WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?!?

                  Moron... when your style stops you from mixing your attack up, that is called being one-dimensional.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                    Hey genius, I have said many times that being one-dimensional does not necessarily disqualify you from being a good, or even great fighter. Pacquiao used to be pretty one-dimensional, but still was a great fighter. He is even better now that he knows how to box more effectively from the outside if he needs to.

                    I just think that the day that someone takes the jab away from Pavlik, he is a dead man in the ring. He won't be able to pile up points on his jab, and he won't be able to set up his right.

                    Calzaghe would crush this kid, badly. I also think Pavlik, being a middleweight, is too small to hurt Calzaghe, who has been struggling to make 168 recently. Calzaghe is too big, too experienced, and overall, just too good for Kelly Pavlik.
                    you're underestimating pavlik that's the problem

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                      Pavlik didn't work on the inside much in either Taylor bout, and really kept Miranda at range for the most part. I have only seen Pavlik's killer instinct against Miranda, and against Taylor in the first fight, but only when he had him hurt. Otherwise, he boxed on the outside with great effectiveness. Calzaghe would tear that **** in half.

                      Kessler looked far from cautious against Librado Andrade, like Pavlik did against Miranda. I think both of those fights are going to be considered oddball fights in their careers when all is said and done.



                      Yeah... you are right, he throws his world class left hook with great frequency.
                      Yes, that's quite true. Pavlik knew the only way to beat Miranda was to put him on the back foot for the entire fight and that's exactly what he did. Non stop relentless pressure. I see Pavlik fighting very similar to how he did against Taylor for most of his career. He's a great fighter but would get beat by Calzaghe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP