Queens, you make some good points, if you were talking about Americans. The ammount of BS coming from the Americans dwarfs the ammount of BS coming from UK posters. Just take a look back to all the "Hopkins gonna KO that eurobum cal***gy" threads and you will see just what I mean....
Most threads stating Calzaghe would win were backed up by serious points, such as "Calzaghe will out work Hopkins" or "Hopkins holds too much to beat Joe"
Whereas most threads regarding a Hopkins victory consisted of such priceless quotes as "that euro bum slaps, he cant beat Hopkins" and "Hopkins might be 43 but hes still better than Calzaghe"
The definition of bias in this case is making rediculous claims without evidence to back up what you say, most Calzaghe threads had some sort of reasoning behind why Joe would win, whereas most Hopkins threads had none, just a bunch of halfwit Americans bashing on british/white fighters.
None of this is aimed at you personally, as you are one of a handful of Americans who come here to actually discuss boxing as a whole, but I do find the fact that you would point this out about British posters to be slightly hypocritical.
Most threads stating Calzaghe would win were backed up by serious points, such as "Calzaghe will out work Hopkins" or "Hopkins holds too much to beat Joe"
Whereas most threads regarding a Hopkins victory consisted of such priceless quotes as "that euro bum slaps, he cant beat Hopkins" and "Hopkins might be 43 but hes still better than Calzaghe"
The definition of bias in this case is making rediculous claims without evidence to back up what you say, most Calzaghe threads had some sort of reasoning behind why Joe would win, whereas most Hopkins threads had none, just a bunch of halfwit Americans bashing on british/white fighters.
None of this is aimed at you personally, as you are one of a handful of Americans who come here to actually discuss boxing as a whole, but I do find the fact that you would point this out about British posters to be slightly hypocritical.
Comment