What is it about Calzaghe?

[big paulie]

You can find names like that on Jones and Hopkins resumes as well. Pudwill came in as a late replacement, he wasn't the chosen opponent.

Salem was a tough cookie, by the way, and one of the dirtiest fighters I've ever seen.

Mario Veit was 30-0 and was the interim WBO super middleweight champion. Joe KOed him in round one.

Veit being 30-0 means **** all and Salem was from that boxing hot bed of....Egypt......hopeless

[S A M U R A I]

* Yawn.....



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[big paulie]

I think we're all losing the point here, its all on celluloid man check it out, look at joes best....It aint that hot

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

ha ha, check again pal... i cant even pronounce some of them let alone spell them...as i said for a champion it is very poor, but then thats why the wbo champs hold onto their titles longer

Veit being 30-0 means **** all and Salem was from that boxing hot bed of....Egypt......hopeless

I guess it's also why the WBO champ unifies all 4 titles against hotly tipped and previously undefeated opponents. How many people can utter the words "I unified my titles twice against undefeated fighters many were backing to KO me"? I can only think of a handful, and Joe is one of them.

As for your second post, Veit was 30-0, but so was Calzaghe. It was, at the time, a 50-50 fight. Nobody expected Joe to blow him away in the fashion in which he did, which says all it really needs to say.

I like the way people are still criticising Joe's record, but hasn't he cleaned up his division? Hasn't he held all four major titles at some point? Even the ring belt? Doesn't he even hold the Ring belt at the next weight up? Who has beaten him exactly? That's what makes me sick. Kelly Pavlik beats Taylor twice and he's "the great white hope" yet Calzaghe is still regarded as "that bum from england"

The people who claim Calzaghe's fans are biased, aren't they the same people who write off everything he's ever done just because he is not American? Do these people not know the meaning of the word "hypocite"?

[RisAri0]

I like Joe because he has his own way of winning... I like winners, period. Joe is one of them.. he gets the job done...y hate sum1 that can get the job done?

[Mozza]

I dont like the guy never have never will as will a lot of people. For me the guy could keep fighting till his sixty become a heavyweight unifie the division. Retire undefeated with a record of 75-0. He could then turn water in to wine, walk on water. Bring peace to the world discover a cure for aids and cancer and get rid of poverty. What is it about the smug welsh bastard that makes him so unlikable?

It's nothing about him. It is ******, biased, uneducated **** like you who have the problem.

[mud19]

It's nothing about him. It is ******, biased, uneducated **** like you who have the problem.

He just gets under my skin just lik Kanye West

[GodOfWar]

I dont like the guy never have never will as will a lot of people. For me the guy could keep fighting till his sixty become a heavyweight unifie the division. Retire undefeated with a record of 75-0. He could then turn water in to wine, walk on water. Bring peace to the world discover a cure for aids and cancer and get rid of poverty. What is it about the smug welsh bastard that makes him so unlikable?

Well, thats odd you hate a boxer who actually tries to make a fight entertaining unlike Hopkins. Could it be that you hate him because he is european or white? I think so, because why else would someone hate a boxer who hits fast enough and hard enough that most of there opponents end up fighting Calzaghe off the ropes....

[johnm is...]

It's nothing about him. It is ******, biased, uneducated **** like you who have the problem.

You're wrong.

It's his eyes. Definitely his eyes.

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

I guess it's also why the WBO champ unifies all 4 titles against hotly tipped and previously undefeated opponents. How many people can utter the words "I unified my titles twice against undefeated fighters many were backing to KO me"? I can only think of a handful, and Joe is one of them.

As for your second post, Veit was 30-0, but so was Calzaghe. It was, at the time, a 50-50 fight. Nobody expected Joe to blow him away in the fashion in which he did, which says all it really needs to say.

I like the way people are still criticising Joe's record, but hasn't he cleaned up his division? Hasn't he held all four major titles at some point? Even the ring belt? Doesn't he even hold the Ring belt at the next weight up? Who has beaten him exactly? That's what makes me sick. Kelly Pavlik beats Taylor twice and he's "the great white hope" yet Calzaghe is still regarded as "that bum from england"

The people who claim Calzaghe's fans are biased, aren't they the same people who write off everything he's ever done just because he is not American? Do these people not know the meaning of the word "hypocite"?

I notice the Calzaghe haters haven't responded.....I wonder why.....