Should Calzaghe be banned from boxing for slapping like a whore?

[kayjay]

No mate, but professionals are. The fight was almost unanimously scored, by ringside officials, by commentators, by networks, by experts, by ex-boxers, by boxing writers as a victory for Calzaghe. So why should you place so much credibility in your own judgements? What are your credentials to do such a thing?

This is an important point. Internet posters who watch boxing on TV think they are qualified to decide everything themselves

[kayjay]

next to Gunstar u are the biggest racist on NSB

Gunstar isn't racist. I promise you that was all jokes

[Technical_Skill]

No mate, but professionals are. The fight was almost unanimously scored, by ringside officials, by commentators, by networks, by experts, by ex-boxers, by boxing writers as a victory for Calzaghe. So why should you place so much credibility in your own judgements? What are your credentials to do such a thing?

Sometimes someone gets robbed on the cards mate, we both know it. The reason it gets publicised as a robbery is because everyone OUTSIDE of the judging table scores it differently (like the Johnson vs Dawson fight)...that didnt happen here. The reason you scored differently is the reason that I already stated.

Wait a minute...Ricky didnt KO Floyd in two rounds? I switched off when he wobbled him in the first, figured it was inevitable. Damn.

You also make it sound like I had professed Jermain Taylor as a P4P number 1 in my own judgement. When in actually I had read that he had been installed as such after the Hopkins fight. If these are the arguments you use to make yourself appear right and knowledgeable, its no wonder you've convinced yourself that Hopkins won that fight.

Listen, after F1, i will go into this.

Even the moron spencer oliver (who has calzaghe 4 rounds ahead, cos he is another jingoistic ****-tard who has to score a fight based on nationality)

said


Hopkins clearly landed the better shots through the fight. Anyways, we now know you score fights on windmill style karate, see ya after the f1.

[Dynamite Kid]

Hopkins didn't win the first four rounds.

Hopkins only won one round comfortably, and that on a terrible flash KD. Joe won six easily and by a wide margin. People have to stretch and give Hopkins every close round to keep from accepting that Joe is what he is

that your opinion

[kayjay]

that your opinion

Yes, it's my rather meaningless opinion. And your opinion is worth the same.

[.Mik.]

Listen, after F1, i will go into this.

Even the moron spencer oliver (who has calzaghe 4 rounds ahead, cos he is another jingoistic ****-tard who has to score a fight based on nationality)

said


Hopkins clearly landed the better shots through the fight. Anyways, we now know you score fights on windmill style karate, see ya after the f1.

There were about 6 CLEAR shots in the fight. 4 to Hopkins, 2 to Calzaghe. In a fight where there are no really and genuinely clear fights, you cant declare a winner on such things. You have to take into account aggression, work-rate, who is forcing the fight, who is controlling the pace and the tempo. That man was Calzaghe for the majority of the fight. Both men were standing at the end, Calzaghe was fresher, Calzaghe was in the better shape, Calzaghe landed more punches and Calzaghe controlled the fight. If it had continued, it would've gone more and more and more in Calzaghe's favour. These are the reasons why Calzaghe won. Hopkins 4 clean shots in 12 rounds were fairly insignificant.

that your opinion

And the opinions of the people that count...the ringside judges. And the opinions of the people that have stopped this from having been a controversial judgement...ie the experts, writers and commentators at ringside. Why is YOUR baseless opinion backed up by virtually nobody other than Hopkins and ardent Hopkins supporters so much more credible?

[Dynamite Kid]

even Duke McKenzie thought Hopkins won the fight ,and Duke is a huge Calzaghe fan

Mike Tyson thought Hopkins won the fight aswell

i perosnally dont think either of them deserved to win Hopkins fought to passively & tried to steal it while Calzaghe marched foward hitting thin air

[kayjay]

even Duke McKenzie thought Hopkins won the fight ,and Duke is a huge Calzaghe fan

Mike Tyson thought Hopkins won the fight aswell

i perosnally dont think either of them deserved to win Hopkins fought to passively & tried to steal it while Calzaghe marched foward hitting thin air

Bingo. Hop gave it away. Joe took it but a bit passively by his standards. The important thing is that a guy fighting as negatively as Hop did never gets a decision for it

[T-97]

Calzaghe clearly won the fight...The racists and ******s out there are going out of there way to discredit Calzaghe.

In your face bitches, Calzaghe ****d Hopkins.

I find myself agreeing with this man more and more.

[Dynamite Kid]

Bingo. Hop gave it away. Joe took it but a bit passively by his standards. The important thing is that a guy fighting as negatively as Hop did never gets a decision for it

i stil dont think Hopkins giving it away should account to a Calzaghe win just because he was forcing the fight

i would have scored it a draw perosnally ,this one of the hardest fights to score since Oscar v Whitaker IMO mind you all Dela Hoya fights seem to be like that