Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Miguel Cotto is the best name to have on your resume right now...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why Miguel Cotto is the best name to have on your resume right now...

    98% of all elite fighters have a certain label attached to them when they lose:

    1. Too small (De La Hoya against Hopkins)
    2. Too old (Hopkins against Calzaghe)
    3. Too green (Witter against Judah)
    4. Too unskilled (Corrales against Mayweather)
    5. Killing themselves to make weight (Miranda against Pavlik)
    6. Hasn't fought anyone (Adamek against Dawson)

    Do you know which of those categories Miguel Cotto falls under? None!

    He is at the proper weight, where he is very big, but doesn't kill himself to make weight. He isn't past his prime at all, but he is a very established great fighter/champion. He is one of the most skillful fighters in the game and has one of the best resumes in the sport that I can think of. Not only does he have some great names on his resume, but he has beaten most of them in a very impressive fashion. Oh yeah, and he also has a tremendous amatuer background which is always a nice addition to any fighter.

    Is there another beast in the sport who doesn't have a ready-made excuse attached to them if they lose? I can't think of any, at all.

  • #2
    Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
    98% of all elite fighters have a certain label attached to them when they lose:

    1. Too small (De La Hoya against Hopkins)
    2. Too old (Hopkins against Calzaghe)
    3. Too green (Witter against Judah)
    4. Too unskilled (Corrales against Mayweather)
    5. Killing themselves to make weight (Miranda against Pavlik)
    6. Hasn't fought anyone (Adamek against Dawson)

    Do you know which of those categories Miguel Cotto falls under? None!

    He is at the proper weight, where he is very big, but doesn't kill himself to make weight. He isn't past his prime at all, but he is a very established great fighter/champion. He is one of the most skillful fighters in the game and has one of the best resumes in the sport that I can think of. Not only does he have some great names on his resume, but he has beaten most of them in a very impressive fashion. Oh yeah, and he also has a tremendous amatuer background which is always a nice addition to any fighter.

    Is there another beast in the sport who doesn't have a ready-made excuse attached to them if they lose? I can't think of any, at all.

    He is also the best fighter in the world IMO.

    Comment


    • #3
      Good post D.

      Comment


      • #4
        plus he is the only man left standing for a title shot

        Cotto>Mosley>Collazo
        Cotto>Zab Judah
        Cotto>Quintana>Williams>Margarito>Cintron and Clottey

        http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=176968

        Comment


        • #5
          Very good point, but haters will always find something. For example if he fought Mayweather and PBF managed to stop him they'd point to Cotto's suspect chin due to being hurt by Corley, Torres, et cetera, you know how haters are.

          Comment


          • #6
            it's a good post, but it shouldnt be posted in BS, it should be posted in very big bold letters in front of mayweather's ****ing face

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kilrain View Post
              Very good point, but haters will always find something. For example if he fought Mayweather and PBF managed to stop him they'd point to Cotto's suspect chin due to being hurt by Corley, Torres, et cetera, you know how haters are.
              ..cosign that

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                98% of all elite fighters have a certain label attached to them when they lose:

                1. Too small (De La Hoya against Hopkins)
                2. Too old (Hopkins against Calzaghe)
                3. Too green (Witter against Judah)
                4. Too unskilled (Corrales against Mayweather)
                5. Killing themselves to make weight (Miranda against Pavlik)
                6. Hasn't fought anyone (Adamek against Dawson)

                Do you know which of those categories Miguel Cotto falls under? None!

                He is at the proper weight, where he is very big, but doesn't kill himself to make weight. He isn't past his prime at all, but he is a very established great fighter/champion. He is one of the most skillful fighters in the game and has one of the best resumes in the sport that I can think of. Not only does he have some great names on his resume, but he has beaten most of them in a very impressive fashion. Oh yeah, and he also has a tremendous amatuer background which is always a nice addition to any fighter.

                Is there another beast in the sport who doesn't have a ready-made excuse attached to them if they lose? I can't think of any, at all.
                I see what your doing there Wont matter though...just wait post-fight

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Parody View Post
                  I see what your doing there Wont matter though...just wait post-fight
                  man you're an idiot.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Kilrain View Post
                    Very good point, but haters will always find something. For example if he fought Mayweather and PBF managed to stop him they'd point to Cotto's suspect chin due to being hurt by Corley, Torres, et cetera, you know how haters are.
                    That's bul**** and you know it!
                    Mayweather's criticism is well deserved!
                    He has only fought two top ten welterweights since he has been in the division so get the **** outta here with that ****!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP